Inability Formulation of Perpetrators to Pay Restitution to Children Victims of Sexual Exploitation
Abstract
This study aims to determine, analyze, and formulate whether the State can pay off restitution that cannot be paid by the perpetrators to children who are victims of the crime of sexual exploitation; and formulate the formulation of provisions regarding the provision of compensation to children victims of the crime of sexual exploitation who cannot obtain restitution because the perpetrator is unable to pay in order to comply with the principles of non-discrimination. This study is an example of normative legal research, employing a statutory and conceptual approach. In this study, the author employs a systematic and theological interpretation approach to the analysis of legal materials. According to the findings of the study, the State could compensate criminals for their inability to pay restitution by providing them with a nominal sum of money. However, this compensation is only available for heinous human rights violations and acts of terrorism. In addition to gross human rights violations and terrorism, this has led to new problems, including injustice for victims, particularly children who are victims of sexual exploitation, who do not receive compensation because the perpetrators cannot pay them.
References
Ali, A. (2009). Menguak Teori Hukum (Legal Theory) dan Teori Peradilan (Judicialprudence), termasuk Interpretasi Undang-Undang (Legisprudence). Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta. Edisi Pertama, Cetakan Ke-2.
Bherta, R. (2021). Perlindungan Anak Sebagai Korban Eksploitasi Seksual. Jurnal Hukum Caraka Justitia, 1(2), 83–95.
Dahlia, C. A. (2022). Kebijakan Kriminal Tentang Hak Restitusi Terhadap Anak Korban Kekerasan Seksual (Kajian Falsafah Pemidanaan Dalam Penegakan Keadilan Berdasarkan Pancasila). Universitas Kristen Indonesia.
Hadjon, P. M. (1987). Perlindungan hukum bagi rakyat di Indonesia: sebuah studi tentang prinsip-prinsipnya, penanganannya oleh pengadilan dalam lingkungan peradilan umum dan pembentukan peradilan administrasi negara. Bina Ilmu.
Hafrida, H. (2019). Restorative Justice in Juvenile Justice to Formulate Integrated Child Criminal Court. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 8(3), 439.
Hakim, L. (2020). Analisis Ketidak Efektifan Prosedur Penyelesaian Hak Restitusi Bagi Korban Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Manusia (Trafficking). Jurnal Kajian Ilmiah, 20(1).
Hamzah, A. (2008). Terminologi hukum pidana. Sinar Grafika.
Iskandar, Umami, A., & Fadilla, D. (2021). Analysis Related To Judges’ Considerations In The Immediate Decision Of Criminal Actions Against Children. Policy, Law, Notary and Regulatory Issues (POLRI), 1(1), 57–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55047/polri.v1i1.32
Mertokusumo, S. (2009). Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia (Edisi ke Delapan). Liberty, Yogyakarta.
Muladi, & Priyatno, D. (1991). Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi dalam Hukum Pidana (1st ed.). Sekolah Tinggi Hukum Bandung.
Murni, M. (2012). Analisis Ekonomi Terhadap Pasal-pasal Hukum Persaingan USAha Dalam Undang-undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999. Arena Hukum, 5(1), 21–30.
Murtadho, A. (2020). Pemenuhan Ganti Kerugian Terhadap Anak Yang Menjadi Korban Tindak Pidana Pencabulan. Jurnal Ham, 11(3), 445–466.
Permata, D. A., Fadjriani, L., Prasetiasari, C., & Idham, I. (2020). Analisis Yuridis Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Anak Sebagai Pelaku Pencabulan (Studi Penelitian Di Polresta Barelang Kota Batam). Zona Hukum: Jurnal Hukum, 14(2), 88–112.
Pruitt, D. G. (2013). Negotiation behavior. Academic Press.
Radbruch, G. (1932). Legal philosophy.
Rahardjo, S. (2010). Penegakan hukum progresif. Penerbit Buku Kompas.
Rahardjo, S. (2020). Ilmu hukum.
Raharjo, S. (2014). Ilmu Hukum, Citra Aditya Bakti: Bandung. Salim Dan Erlies.
Rubin, J. Z., Pruitt, D. G., & Kim, S. H. (1994). Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement. Mcgraw-Hill Book Company.
Sahetapy, J. E. (1995). Bunga Rampai Viktimisasi. Eresco, Bandung.
Satochid, K. (2008). Hukum Pidana. Kumpulan Kuliah, Balai Lektur Mahasiswa, Jakarta.
Sholehuddin, M. (2003). Sistem sanksi dalam hukum pidana: Ide dasar double track system & implementasinya. Raja grafindo persada.
Sinaulan, J. H. (2018). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Warga Masyarakat. Ideas: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, Dan Budaya, 4(1).
Wirjono, P. (1989). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. PT. Eresco.
Zernova, M. (2007). Aspirations of restorative justice proponents and experiences of participants in family group conferences. The British Journal of Criminology, 47(3), 491–509.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the journal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
