Purposes and Guidelines of Sentencing as an Effort to Prevent Criminal Disparities
Abstract
In order to establish a national criminal law based on basic values and the realities of life in an Indonesian society, then the failure of a national penal code code that was enacted in act no. 1 year 2023 asa replacement for the penal code (WvS) that was not in accordance with the Indonesian way of life was devised. The national penal code is based on an idea of balance, so it's defined for purpose and guidelines that were not previously defined explicitly in the penal code (WvS). The formulation of goals and guidelines of idling is the renewal of criminal laws to achieve using a policy and value approach. The aim and guidelines for idling are the solution to the problem of criminal disparity in Indonesia because they are based on criminal flexibility andasa judge foundation in rendering a criminal. The method used in this study was normative-juridical, which was the study of literature on legal principles. The result of this study is that the purpose and guidelines of idling are set up in the national penal code to achieve the well-being and protection of society and the purpose and guidelines of idling asa prevention to disparity through the inducing of the judge to make the ruling more proportionate and easier for the judge to understand the reason why crime is so meted out.
References
Barda Nawawi. (2011). Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana dalam Perspektif Kajian Perbandingan, Citra Aditya Bakti: Bandung.
Barda Nawawi. (2020). Perkembangan asas-asas hukum pidana Indonesia. BP Undip.
Barda Nawawi. (2022). , Tujuan dan Pedoman Pemidanaan (Perspektif Pembaharuan & Perbandingan Hukum Pidana), Magister: Semarang.
Barda Nawawi Arief. (1994). Beberapa aspek pengembangan ilmu hukum pidana [Pidato pengukuhan]. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro.
Cassia C. Sphon. (2008). How do judges decide: The search for fairness and justice in punishment. Sage Publications.
Eddy Hiariej. (2016). Prinsip-prinsip hukum pidana. Cahaya Atma Pustaka.
Harkristuti Harkrisnowo. (2003). Rekonstruksi konsep pemidanaan: Suatu gugatan terhadap proses legislasi dan pemidanaan di Indonesia [Orasi pengukuhan guru besar]. Universitas Indonesia.
Muladi, & Barda Nawawi. (2010). Teori-teori dan kebijakan pidana. Alumni.
Muladi dan Diah Sulistyani. (2020). Catatan Empat Dekade Perjuangan Turut Mengawal Terwujudnya KUHP Nasional (Bagian I, 1980-2020), Universitas Semarang Press.
Sudarto. (1981). Kapita selekta hukum pidana. Alumi.
Sudarto. (1982). Pemidanaan, pidana dan tindakan. BPHN.
Soerjono Soekanto. (2006). Penelitian hukum normatif. Raja Grafindo.
Mudzakkir. (2020). Perencanaan pembangunan hukum nasional bidang hukum pidana dalam sistem pemidanaan. Departemen Hukum dan HAM, BPHN.
Noveria Devy Irmawati, & Barda Nawawi. (2021). Urgensi tujuan dan pedoman pemidanaan dalam rangka pembaharuan sistem pemidanaan hukum pidana. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 3(2).
Nimerodi Gulo, & Ade Kurniawan Muharram. (2018). Disparitas dalam penjatuhan pidana. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 47(3).
Naskah akademik Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun (2023).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the journal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
