The Implementation Law of Concerning Electronic Information and Transactions in Indonesia as a Political Crime Committed by the State
Abstract
In the practice of the Indonesia republic has evolved from an authoritarian system into a democratic system, whether with the current democratic system political crime is no longer perpetrated by governments. The purpose of this research is to identify whether information laws and electronic transactions are a crime committed by the state through a byline. The method of research used in this study was normative-juridical, while the approach taken was legislation and conceptual. Research shows that it is true that a crime is committed by the state to people whose politics differs from that of a ruler or a government. It was therefore necessary to abolish the rubber chapters in the its constitution in order to create and bring justice to the people.
References
Anton Hendrik Samudra,2020, Pencemaran Nama Baik Dan Penghinaan Melalui Media Teknologi Informasi Komunikasi Di Indonesia Pasca Amandemen UU ITE, Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan.
Artidjo Alkotsar, 1999, Reformasi Hukum Pidana Politik, Jurnal Hukum NO 11 VOL, 6. https://Journal.uii.ac.id.
Budi Suhariyanto,2013,Tindak Pidana Teknologi Informasi (Cybercrime) Urgensi Pengaturan dan Celah Hukumnya Depok: PT. Rajagrafindo Persada.
Devi Angeliawati, “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencemaran Nama Baik (Studi Putusan Nomor: 6/Pid.Sus/2017/Pn Slr),” Celebes Cyber Crime Journal, 1.1 (2019).
Hendardi Hendardi, 1997, Kejahatan Politik Di Indonesia, Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan Home > Vol 27, No 1 (1997).
I Wayan Parthiana,2004, Hukum Pidana Internasional dan Ekstradisi, Yrama Widya, Bandung.
Jan Remmelink,2003, Hukum Pidana: Komentar atas Pasal-Pasal Terpenting dari KUHP Belanda dan Padanannya dalam KUHP Indonesia, Gramedia, Jakarta.
Loebby Loqman, 1993, Delik Politik Di Indonesia, IND-HILL-CO, Jakarta.
Readi Supriyadi, Kejahatan Politik, dimuat pada hari Rabu, 21 November 2012 di website http://readisupriyadi.blogspot.com/2012/11/ kejahatan-politik-hukum-pidana-khusus.html.
Supriyadi Widodo Eddyono, Wahyudi Djafar ,Fajrimei A. Gofar, 2013, Kejahatan Ideologi Dalam R KUHP,Institute for Criminal Justice Reform (ICJR), Jakarta.
Tampubolon, Wahyu S .2016. Upaya Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen DitinjauDari Undang Undang Perlindungan Konsumen. Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi, Vol.4,(No.1),p.12.DOI:10.36987/jiad.v4i 1.356.
Yosephus Mainake dan Luthvi Febryka Nola, DAMPAK PASAL-PASAL MULTITAFSIR DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG TENTANG INFORMASI DAN TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK, Vol. XII, No.16/II/Puslit/Agustus/2020.
Pasal 27 ayat (3) Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, 2005, Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta; Kencana.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the journal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
