Critical Review of Criminal Accountability for the Perpetrators of a Crime Committed Against the President via Social Media Facebook (Number Rule Study 278/Pid.B/2020/PN.Gns)

  • Muchammad Daing Azimattara Master of Law, Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University, Indonesia
  • Eko Soponyono Master of Law, Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University, Indonesia
Keywords: Criminal Liability; Criminal Insults; President

Abstract

A felony offense against a President is a felony which attacks a person's right to defame a good name or honor which is, of course, regulated by the law, the President is the head of state and the vice President is the vice President. With such a position, both the President and the vice President have honor and a good name, a man of such rank should be honored. The purpose of this study is to examine critically how a criminal accounting for a criminal offense is against the President and whether the judge's ruling on rule number 278/ pid. B/2020/ pn is already at the point of idleness. This research method USES the normatif juridical and empirical juridical approaches, the data used is primary and secondary data collection with library studies and interviews. The accused has the ability to take responsibility in psychic conditions and there is a deliberate error, no excuse for forgiveness or correction, action that prompts a consequence is prohibited by the law and conforms to the elements of the judge's verdict in rule number 278/ pid. B/2020/ pn GNS has met the purpose of idling, that the perpetrators get a punishment according to the results of the evidence. and some of the tools and goods and evidence presented at trial so that the criminal elements in 207 criminal articles have been met to meet the perpetrators.

References

Bawengan G.W. Pengantar Psychologi Kriminil. Pradnya Paramita. Jakarta. 1997.
Kansil C.S.T. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum dan Tata Hukum Indonesia. Pradnya Paramita. Jakarta. 1989.
Kartanegara, Satochid. Hukum Pidana 1. (Balai Lektur Mahasiswa: Jakarta). 1996.
Friedmann, Laurence M. Teori dan Filsafat Hukum : Idealisms Filosofis dan Problema Keadilan Susunan 11. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta. 2009.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelilian Hukum. Prenada Media Group. Jakarta, 2005.
Marpaung, Leden. Tindak Pidana Terhadap Kehormatan Pengertian dan Penerapannya. PT Grafindo Persada. Jakarta. 2007.
Moeljatno. Asas – Asas Hukum Pidana. Rineka Cipta. Jakarta. 2003.
Muhammad, Abdulkadir. Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum. PT. Citra Aditya Bakti. Bandung. 2004.
Muladi dan Barda Nawawi Arief. Teori-Teori dan Kebijakan Pidana. Alumni. Bandung. 1998.
Mulyadi, Lilik. Kekuasaan Kehakiman. Bina Ilmu. Surabaya. 2007.
Nawawi Arief, Barda. Masalah Penegakan Hukum dan Kebijakan Penanggulangan Kejahatan. Citra Aditya Bakti. Bandung. 2001.
Prodjodikoro, Wirjono. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. Eresco. Jakarta. 1981.
Rahardjo, Satjipto. Masalah Penegakan Hukum. Sinar Baru. Bandung. 1983.
Rosidah, Nikmah. Asas-asas Hukum Pidana. (Pustaka Magister: Semarang). 2011.
Sahetapy JE. Paradoks dalam Kriminologi. Jakarta. 1992.
Saleh, Roeslan. Stelsel Pidana Indonesia. Aksara Baru. Jakarta. 1998.
Santoso, Topo dan Eva Achjani Zulfa. Kriminologi. PT Raja Grafinfo Persada. Jakarta. 2003.
Soedarto. Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana. Alumni. Bandung. 1986.
Soekanto, Soerjono. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Rineka Cipta. Jakarta. 1983.
Soesilo R. Kriminologi (Pengetahuan tentang Sebab – sebab Kejahatan). Politea. Bogor. 1985.
Syarifin, Pipin. Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia. CV. Pustaka Setia. Bandung. 2000.
Tongat. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia dalam Perspektif Pembaharuan. UMM Pres. Malang. 2008.
Tunggal, Alam Wawan. Pencemaran Nama Baik di Kehidupan Nyata dan Dunia Internet. Wartapena. Jakarta. 2012.
Utrecht. E dan Moch Saleh Djindang. Pengantar Dalam Hukum Indonesia. Sinar Harapan. Jakarta. 1983.
Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung, Putusan Nomor: 278/Pid.B/2020/PN.Gns.
https://www.kompas.com/skola/read/2020/05/29/133000469/kewenanganpresiden-sebagai-kepala-negara-dan-kepala-pemerintahan.
http://www.pngunungsugih.go.id/main/tugaspokokdanfungsi/tentangpengadilan/uraian-tugas,Diakses pada 1 Januari 2022 Pukul 20.30.
Published
2023-04-13
How to Cite
Azimattara, M. D., & Soponyono, E. (2023). Critical Review of Criminal Accountability for the Perpetrators of a Crime Committed Against the President via Social Media Facebook (Number Rule Study 278/Pid.B/2020/PN.Gns). International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 6(4), 567-573. https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v6i4.1194