The Criminal Imposition Revolution in the Death Penalty in Indonesia
Abstract
The pro and con conflicts related to the implementation of capital punishment in Indonesia are still a quite complicated debate both in terms of the old Criminal Code and the National Criminal Code. Death penalty is considered as a deprivation of human rights to maintain life. This is considered as a rejection of the provisions of article 28 of the 1945 Constitution which explains all human rights in it. For those who oppose the death penalty, the state is considered to have violated Article 28 of the 1945 Constitution even though it is an order of office which is in accordance with other legal regulations. In the old Criminal Code, death penalty is included in the main punishment, while in the National Criminal Code, death penalty is included in special punishment. In its development from the Old Criminal Code and the National Criminal Code, the paradigm of the death penalty remains in the concept that punishment is an alternative way, even with the death penalty which, as much as possible, if there is a way out other than capital punishment, then that's good. The formulation of capital punishment is not merely punishing someone by eliminating the right to life. Implementation of capital punishment is also carried out as a last alternative so that in the National Criminal Code the formulation of capital punishment is adjusted to the culture, values and norms that live in Indonesian society and the laws that apply in Indonesia.
References
Agustina. Obstruction Of Justice Tindak Pidana Menghalangi Proses Hukum Dalam Upaya Pemberantasan Korupsi. Jakarta: Themis Book, 2015.
Arief, Barda Nawawi. Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2005.
———. Kebijakan Kriminal. Semarang: Universitas Diponogoro, 2007.
Hadiyanto, Alwan. “Pro Dan Kontra Pidana Mati Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Dimensi 5, no. 2 (2016): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.33373/dms.v5i2.3.
HalimBarkatullah, Prasetyo dan Abdul. Politik HukumPidana (Kajian Kebijakan Kriminalisasi Dan Dekriminalisasi). jakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2005.
Hamzah, Andi. Sistem Pidana Dan Pemidanaan Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita., 1993.
Hamzah, and Sumangelipu. Pidana Mati Di Indonesia Di Masa Lalu, Kini Dan Di Masa Depan. Jakarta: ghalia indonesia, 1985.
Imparsial, Tim. Menggugat Hukuman Mati Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Tim Imparsial, 2010.
Khairawati. “Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Pemberian Grasi Kepada Terpidana Narkoba Dalam Perspektif Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana.” Law Reform Volume 9, no. Nomor 1, 2014: 115.
Marpaung, Leden dan. Asas, Teori, Praktik Hukum Pidana. jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2005.
Muladi. Proyeksi Hukum Pidana Materiil Di Masa Datang. Semarang: Tim Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, 1994.
Nawawi, Muladi dan Barda. Teori-Teori Dan Kebijakan Pidana. Bandung: Alumni Bandung, 1984.
Poerwodarminto. Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Pusat Pembinaan Pengembangan Bahasa Indonesia Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 1983.
Prakoso, Djoko, and Nurwachid. Studi Tentang Pendapat-Pendapat Mengenai Efektivitas Pidana Mati Di Indonesia Dewasa Ini. Jakarta: ghalia indonesia, 1984.
Prasetyo, Teguh. Hukum Pidana. jakarta: Grasindo, 2012.
Robyanugrah, and Raja Desril. “Kebijakan Formulasi Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia.” Journal Equitable 6, no. 1, 2021: 43–63. https://doi.org/10.37859/jeq.v6i1.2683.
Sahetapy. Pidana Mati Dalam Negara Pancasila. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2007.
———. Suatu Studi Khusus Mengenai Acaman Pidana Mati Terhadap Pembunuhan Berencana. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 1982.
Sambaz, Nandang. “Penerapan Pidana Mati Dalam Hukum Pidana Nasional,” no. 1, 1997: 248–57.
Soponyono, Eko. “Kebijakan Perumusan Sistem Pemidanaan Yang Berorientasi Pada Korban.” Masalah-Masalah Hukum Volume 41, no. Nomor 1, 2012.
Todung, Lubis dan. “Kontroversi Hukuman Mati.” Jakarta, 2009.
Widyaningrum, Hesti. “Perbandingan Pengaturan Hukuman Mati Di Indonesia Dan Amerika Serikat.” Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi 3, no. 1, 2020: 99–115. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v3i1.3777.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the journal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
