Assessment of Visum Et Repertum Evidence on Victims of Women Violence in Household Conflict
Abstract
The type of research used in this research is normative legal research. By using primary and secondary legal materials, along with tertiary legal materials as supporting materials. This is by looking at the strength and position of the Visum Et Repertum evidence in a criminal act. Visum et Repertum has a fairly strong evidentiary power, because Visum et Repertum is one of the documents of evidence as regulated in Article 184 paragraph (1) letter c Jo. Article 187 letter c of the Criminal Procedure Code. The Public Prosecutor's indictment was made with great attention to the evidence for the role of Visum et Repertum. The consequence that arises if the Visum et Repertum given by the Defendant is a different statement is that the statement can be revoked if the Defendant is given a false confession that is indeed proven. Regarding the Visum et Repertum itself, it can be re-examined from a legal advisor or a statement of objection raised clearly given by the defendant can be proven, this is regulated in Article 180 paragraphs (2), (3) and (4) of the Criminal Procedure Code. Based on the experience, it was carried out and from the Judge himself it was known.
References
Hukum perkawinan beda agama dalam teori dan praktiknya di Indonesia / Sirman Dahwal | Perpustakaan UIN Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau (no date). Available at: http://inlislite.uin-suska.ac.id/opac/detail-opac?id=22641 (Accessed: June 4, 2022).
Kekerasan dalam Rumah Tangga: Laporan Kasus | Utama | JUKE Unila (no date). Available at: https://juke.kedokteran.unila.ac.id/index.php/juke/article/view/635 (Accessed: June 4, 2022).
Keterangan Ahli Visum & Visum Et Repertum dalam Aspek Hukum Acara Pidana (no date). Available at: http://mandarmaju.com/main/detail/17/Keterangan-Ahli-Visum-Visum-Et-Repertum-dalam-Aspek-Hukum-Acara-Pidana (Accessed: June 4, 2022).
Kusmira, N.P. (2016) “Kekuatan Pembuktian Dan Penilaian Alat Bukti Visum Et Repertum Dalam Tindak Pidana Persetubuhan Terhadap Anak,” Verstek, 4(3). doi:10.20961/JV.V4I3.38772.
Michael, T. (2022) “Unraveling the Importance of Democracy in Formation Legislation,” International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 5(4), pp. 20–24. doi:10.47814/IJSSRR.V5I4.254.
Mulyadi, L. (2005) “Pengadilan anak di Indonesia : teori, praktik, dan permasalahannya,” p. 388.
P Moeljatno (no date) Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Available at: http://perpustakaanjdih.batangkab.go.id//index.php?p=show_detail&id=7853 (Accessed: June 4, 2022).
Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Perempuan Korban Kekerasan dalam Rumah Tangga (KDRT) pada Tingkat Penyidikan Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 23 Tahun 2004 tentang Penghapusan Kekerasan dalam Rumah Tangga (UUPKDRT) (no date). Available at: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Perlindungan-Hukum-terhadap-Perempuan-Korban-dalam-Wardhani/380126a6ac8e09d428d35759b5150d24da9d1c5d (Accessed: June 4, 2022).
Visum et Repertum Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan | Jurnal Analogi Hukum (no date). Available at: https://www.ejournal.warmadewa.ac.id/index.php/analogihukum/article/view/3035 (Accessed: June 4, 2022).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the journal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
