Legal Politics on Amendment of Law No.12 Year 2011 Concerning the Establishment of Legislation Regulations with Thoughts of Legal Characteristics of Philip Nonet and Philip Selznich
Abstract
The type of research used in this research is normative legal research. The position of Philippe Nonet and Philip Selznick to understand and analyze characteristics of responsive law as a form of legal harmonization. In terms of the scope of legal harmonization, L.M. Gandhi, who quoted the book Tussen eenheid en verscheidenheid: Opstellen over harmonization instaaat en bestuurecht (1988) said that harmonization in law includes adjustments to laws and regulations, government decisions, judges' decisions, the legal system and legal principles with the aim of increasing legal unity, legal certainty, justice (justice, gerechtigheid) and comparability (equit, billijkeid), usefulness and clarity of law, without obscuring and sacrificing legal pluralism if necessary. The function of law and politics in view of Philip Nonet and Philip Shelnick is a very close relationship, the law is a statutory regulation which is actually a crystallization of political wills that interact and influence each other. Legal politics is defined as official line of state policy to make and stipulate laws and regulations in order to achieve ideals and goals of the state as contained in preamble of 1945 Constitution Republic of Indonesia, paragraph IV. The implementation of legal politics is in form of enactment of legislation that is used as a tool to achieve state goals, which is in accordance with the basic framework of national legal politics, which can be seen in PROLEGNAS and PROLEGDA.
References
Fathorrahman, F. (2021). Politik Hukum Hierarki Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Indonesia. HUKMY : Jurnal Hukum, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.35316/hukmy.2021.v1i1.73-90
Hamzani, A. I. (2019). Menggagas Indonesia sebagai Negara Hukum yang Membahagiakan Rakyatnya. Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, 3(3), 137–142. https://doi.org/10.20961/YUSTISIA.V3I3.29562
Hidayat, A., & Arifin, Z. (2019). POLITIK HUKUM LEGISLASI SEBAGAI SOCIO-EQUILIBRIUM DI INDONESIA. Jurnal Ius Constituendum. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v4i2.1654
Hikmawati, P. (n.d.). SINKRONISASI DAN HARMONISASI HUKUM PENYELENGGARAAN OTONOMI DAERAH: STUDI DI PROVINSI BALI.
Huda, N. (2008). UUD NRI 1945 Dan Gagasan Amandemen Ulang. Rajawali Pers.
Islamiyati, I., & Hendrawati, D. (2019). Analisis Politik Hukum Dan Implementasinya. Law, Development and Justice Review, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.14710/ldjr.v2i1.5139
Michael, T. (2020). Requirements for Death in Dismissal of Constitutional Justices. Research, Society and Development. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i10.9458
Michael, T. (2022). Unraveling the Importance of Democracy in Formation Legislation. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 5(4), 20–24. https://doi.org/10.47814/IJSSRR.V5I4.254
Ostrikova, T. (2022). Legal Origins and Intersectoral Regulation of AEO Institution. Lex Portus, 2022(1). https://doi.org/10.26886/2524-101X.8.1.2022.3
Siallagan, H. (2016). PENERAPAN PRINSIP NEGARA HUKUM DI INDONESIA. Sosiohumaniora. https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v18i2.9947
SUHARTONO. (n.d.). HARMONISASI PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN DALAM PELAKSANAAN ANGGARAN BELANJA NEGARA (SOLUSI PENYERAPAN ANGGARAN BELANJA NEGARA YANG EFISIEN, EFEKTIF DAN AKUNTABEL).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the journal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
