Digital Neighborhood Management through Advanced Data Capture and Network Technology

Gulsara Ostonaqulova; Sitora Sayfitdin's qizi Odilova

doi:10.47814/ijssrr.v8i4.2612

Gulsara Ostonaqulova Marketing department, Tashkent State University of Economics, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
Sitora Sayfitdin's qizi Odilova Marketing Department, Tashkent State University of Economics, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v8i4.2612

Keywords: Digital Neighborhood Management, Urban Connectivity, Community Satisfaction, Data-Capturing Technology, Resource Allocation, Network Analysis, Smart Urban Planning

Abstract

This research delves into the idea of managing the "Digital Neighborhood," which involves using data collection and networking tools to improve systems, in residential areas as cities expand and technology advances rapidly. To meet the demands of urbanization and technological progress effectively requires neighborhood management systems that facilitate connectivity, real time monitoring and decision making based on data analysis. The study investigates how network analysis and correlation techniques can uncover connections, among neighborhood features, infrastructure and community management strategies. Through examining data gathered from areas in a specific timeframe; this research seeks out trends, in online interactions and technology usage as well as how resources are used within communities. Analyzing networks helps identify links between digital elements while correlation techniques reveal important connections between digital resources and community satisfaction levels. The results suggest that neighborhoods with data capturing and networking tools tend to have levels of engagement and more effective resource allocation. The study emphasizes the benefits of using technologies for managing neighborhoods to enhance governance responsiveness; improve access, to services; and promote community well- being. The findings help create a structure, for management systems that can adjust to neighborhood settings effectively. In summary this study shows how advanced digital tools can significantly change neighborhood management providing a direction, for planning projects that emphasize digital infrastructure and community involvement.

References

Alawadhi, S., & Scholl, H. J. (2016). Smart governance: A cross-case analysis of smart city initiatives. Government Information Quarterly, 33(3), 454–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.07.004.

Bibri, S. E., & Krogstie, J. (2020). Smart sustainable cities of the future: An extensive interdisciplinary literature review. Sustainable Cities and Society, 55, 102257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102257.

Bolivar, M. P. R. (2019). Smart cities’ governance: The need for a holistic approach to smart urban governance. Public Administration Review, 79(6), 957–966. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13010.

Chen, M., Mao, S., & Liu, Y. (2014). Big data: A survey. Mobile Networks and Applications, 19(2), 171–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-013-0489-0.

De Lange, M., & De Waal, M. (2019). The Hackable City: Digital media and collaborative city-making in the network society. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 40(1), 56–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjtg.12267.

Falco, E., & Kleinhans, R. (2018). Digital participatory platforms for co-production in urban development: A systematic review. International Journal of E-Planning Research, 7(3), 52–79. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEPR.2018070104.

Karakiza, M. (2015). The impact of social media in the public sector. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 175, 384–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.1211.

McKinsey Global Institute. (2018). Smart city technology for a more livable future. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com.

Mohammadi, M., & Al-Fuqaha, A. (2018). Internet of Things enabled smart city frameworks: A comprehensive review. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 20(3), 1833–1859. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2018.2814983.

Nam, T., & Pardo, T. A. (2011). Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference on Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times, 282–291. https://doi.org/10.1145/2037556.2037602.

Ojo, A., Curry, E., & Janowski, T. (2014). Designing next-generation digital government architectures: Organizational and operational challenges. Government Information Quarterly, 31(1), 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.06.002.

Sen, S., & Silva, E. A. (2020). Evaluating the sustainable development impact of smart cities: Comparative analysis of selected cases. Cities, 98, 102487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102487.

Tilson, D., Lyytinen, K., & Sørensen, C. (2010). Digital infrastructures: The missing IS research agenda. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 748–759. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0320.

Vanolo, A. (2014). Smartmentality: The smart city as disciplinary strategy. Urban Studies, 51(5), 883–898. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013494427.

Vojinović, Z., Abbott, M. B., & Gersonius, B. (2009). Holistic approach to flood risk assessment in areas with cultural heritage: The Pienza case study. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 2(3), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-318X.2009.01034.x.