Legal Protection of Trade Secret from the View of Civil and Criminal Law
Abstract
Indonesia has ratified the WTO/TRIPs Agreement convention and is in full compliance and non-reservation, the insistence of developed countries’ owners of Intellectual Property Rights against Indonesia, and the need for national Intellectual Property Rights. By looking at the above, legal protection is needed for every product and service, especially licenses for trade secrets in the Intellectual Property Rights component. The state imposes criminal sanctions on violators of Trade Secret rights as stipulated in chapter 17 (1) constitution number 30/2000. However, it is also hoped that the act of imposing sanctions by the state will return to the interests of the protected party by making the crime a complaint offense chapter 17 (2) constitution number 30/2000. There are repressive legal actions that can be carried out as chapter 11 constitution number 30/2000 states that the holder of trade secret rights or the licensee may sue anyone who deliberately or without rights commits the actions referred to in the article in the form of (a). Compensations claim and/or; (b). Cessation of all actions referred to in chapter 4 constitution number 30/2000.
References
Alfreda, Ivan Juan, Rika Ratna Permata, and Tasya Safiranita Ramli. 2021. ‘Pelindungan Dan Tanggung Jawab Kebocoran Informasi Pada Penyedia Platform Digital Berdasarkan Perspektif Rahasia Dagang’, Jurnal Sains Sosio Humaniora, 5.1
Benuf, Kornelius, and Muhamad Azhar. 2020. ‘Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Sebagai Instrumen Mengurai Permasalahan Hukum Kontemporer’, Gema Keadilan, 7.1 (Institute of Research and Community Services Diponegoro University (LPPM UNDIP)): 20–33
Chandrika, Riandhani Septian. 2019. ‘PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM PERJANJIAN LISENSI RAHASIA DAGANG DI INDONESIA’, Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune, 2.1 (Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya): 11
Koopman, Robert, John Hancock, Roberta Piermartini, and Eddy Bekkers. 2020. ‘The Value of the WTO’, Journal of Policy Modeling, 42.4 (Elsevier B.V.): 829–49
Mahfuz, Abdul Latif. 2020. ‘Problematik Hukum Hak Atas Kekayaan Intelektual (HAKI) Di Indonesia’, Jurnal Kepastian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 1.2
Pangestu, Yudha, Bernard Sipahutar, and Budi Ardianto. 2021. ‘Harmonisasi Prinsip Perdagangan Internasional Pada GATT Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perdagangan’, Uti Possidetis: Journal of International Law, 2.1
Retnowati, Endang. 2004. ‘KEWAJIBAN MENJAGA KERAHASIAAN PENERIMA LISENSI RAHASIA DAGANG’, Perspektif, 9.3
Setiady, Tri. 2015. ‘HARMONISASI PRINSIP-PRINSIP TRIPS AGREEMENT DALAM HAK KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL DENGAN KEPENTINGAN NASIONAL’, FIAT JUSTISIA:Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8.4 (Fiat Justisia)
Sulasno, Sulasno. 2019. ‘LISENSI HAK KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL (HKI) DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PERJANJIAN DI INDONESIA’, ADIL: Jurnal Hukum, 3.2
Wingit, Rindoko Dahono. 2001. ‘TINJAUAN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM RAHASIA DAGANG’, Perspektif, 6.1
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the journal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
