Polemic of Law No. 23 of 2019 Concerning Management of National Resources for National Defense Formation of Reserve Components
Abstract
The study of legal politics in the polemic of Law No. 23 of 2019 PSDN, legal politics, namely legal policies that determine the direction, form and content of law which includes the formation, application and enforcement of law in order to achieve certain social goals/state goals. So linked in this sense the formation and application of this law creates confusion for implementers and society. so that the formulation of the problem is how to carry out the formal and material formation procedures for Law No. 23 of 2019 concerning the Management of National Resources for the Formation of Reserve Components and what are the suitability of substances and the results of material reviews by the Constitutional Court. The approach method used in this research is juridical-normative, this study concludes Whereas the PSDN Law has formally been formed and ratified, but materially there are norms or principles that are still not accommodated in these regulations so that it is feared that it will cause friction between one law and another and there is overlap between regulations (the PSDN Law and the State Defense Law) which regulates the same matter with regard to the concept of defending the country (reserve component). One of the several polemical articles of the PSDN Law, namely the concept of human rights (HAM), which was not fully given limited space to citizens in the election process, became a reserve component.
References
Dede Anggara Saputra, “Analisis Politik Hukum Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2019 Tentang Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Nasional Untuk Pertahanan Negara”, Jurnal Lex Renaissance, Vol 5, No.47, 2020.
https://kontras.org/2021/05/31/pengaturan-komponen-cadangan-dalam-uu-psdn-tidak-sesuai-dengan-tata-nilai-konstitusi-dan-ham/, Diakses Pada Tanggal 17 November 2022.
Laporan Laporan Akhir, Kajian dan Evaluasi UU No 23 Tahun 2019 tentang Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Nasional Untuk Pertahanan Negara, kerjasama Badan Pembinaan Ideologi Pancasila (BPIP) Dengan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bangka Belitung (FH UBB), 2019.
Muhtar, M. H., Hadju, Z. A. A., Abdussamad, Z., & Gobel, R. T. S. (2022). Perluasan Kewenangan Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia Terhadap Pengawasan Media Digital. Jurnal Konstitusi, 19(1).
Muhtar, Mohamad Hidayat, Zamroni Abdussamad, and Zainal Abdul Aziz Hadju. "Studi Perbandingan Penanganan Pengungsi Luar Negeri Di Indonesia, Australia, Dan Thailand." Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM 30.1 (2023).
Nanda Perdana Putra, “Pro Kontra Rekrutmen Komponen Cadangan, UU PSDN Digugat ke MK”, https://www.merdeka.com/peristiwa/pro-kontra-rekrutmen-komponen-cadangan-uu-psdn-digugat-ke-mk.html, Diakses Pada Tanggal 17 November 2022.
Nanto Nurhuda. “Strategi Mencegah Munculnya Ekses Negatif Paska Pembentukan Komponen Cadangan Di Indonesia”, Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, Vol.1, No 1, 2021.
Naskah Akademik Rancangan Undang-Undang tentang Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Nasional untuk Pertahanan Negara, https://www.bphn.go.id/data/document/na ruu tentang pengelolaan sumber daya nasionaluntuk pertahanan negara.pdf, hlm. 73. Retna Gumanti, “Reconceptualizing Consumer Contracts in the Philosophical Perspective of Pancasila”, 1 (1) Prophetic Law Review 37, 2019.
Undang-Undang Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Undang-Undang No 23 Tahun 2019 Tentang Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Nasional Untuk Pertahanan Negara.
Undang-Undang No 3 Tahun 2002 tentang Pertahanan Negara.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the journal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
