Consideration of Investigators in Carrying Out Restorative Justice to Resolve Cases of Persecution Criminal Acts Committed at the Cilegon Resort Police
Abstract
Diversity and Justice Justice is a norm in the Criminal Justice System in Indonesia, as stipulated in Law Number 2012 concerning the Juvenile Justice System. This study intends to determine what considerations investigators examine while implementing Restorative Justice to solve cases of criminal persecution committed by the Cilegon Resort Police. This research design uses descriptive analysis. This is a as a qualitative descriptive research. The case approach will be utilized, and using this approach, the author will conduct an analysis based on the standards or guidelines that are common in legal practice. The findings of this study indicate that the application of Restorative Justice in the resolution of minor offenses of persecution is seen as an effective innovation in case resolution and is carried out in accordance with applicable legal principles. The existence of a crime of persecution has the potential to not be resolved with a restorative approach if it is based on Article 5 of the Political Party 8/2021, because it has the potential to conflict with material needs. However, the National Police must examine the circumstances of the persecution holistically, as the sentencing and the consequences of the sanctions are not comparable. Therefore, the Police are required to wisely examine the existence of this persecution in a comprehensive manner.
References
Astuti, L. (2017). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak yang Berhadapan Berhadapan Dengan Hukum Dalam Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas. Justitia Jurnal Hukum, 1(1).
Chandra, S. (2014). Politik Hukum Pengadopsian Restorative Justice Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana. Fiat Justisia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(2), 255–277.
Chazawi, A. (2011). pelajaran hukum pidana 3.
Dahniel, R. A. (2009). Diskresi Kepolisian dalam Nilai-nilai Dasar Hukum. KIK-UI, Jakarta.
Hadisuprapto, P. (2003). Pemberian Malu Reintegratif Sebagai Sarana Non Penal Penanggulangan Perilaku Delinkuensi Anak (Studi Kasus di Semarang dan Surakarta). Disertasi, Semarang: Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum Universitas Diponegoro.
Hartono, M. R. (2016). Upaya Pencegahan Kejahatan Oleh Direktorat Reserse Kriminal Umum (Ditreskrimum) Polda Jambi Melalui Tindakan Preventif. Jurnal Lex Specialis, (24), 70–84.
Pranis, K. (1998). Engaging The Community in Restorative Justice: Balanced and Restorative Justice. Minesota Press, Florida.
Rahardjo, S. (2010). Penegakan hukum progresif. Penerbit Buku Kompas.
Santoso, T., & Wahid, H. N. (2000). Menggagas hukum pidana Islam: penerapan syariah Islam dalam konteks modernitas. Asy-Syaamil Press & Grafika.
Senen, Z. A. (2021). Rekonseptulisasi Penegakkan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Dan Korban Undang-Undang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik Berbasis Restorative Justice. Lex Renaissance, 6(2), 265–279.
Soetodjo, W. (2010). Hukum Pidana. In Bandung: PT.Refika Aditama.
Suka, I., & Gunarto, G. (2018). Peran Dan Tanggung Jawab Polri Sebagai Penegak Hukum Dalam Melaksanaan Restorative Justice Untuk Keadilan Dan Kemanfaatan Masyarakat. Jurnal Hukum Khaira Ummah, 13(1), 111–118.
Wahyudi, S. (2009). Penegakan peradilan pidana anak dengan pendekatan hukum progresif dalam rangka perlindungan anak. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 9(1), 29–39.
Legislation
The Criminal Code.
Police Regulation Number 8 of (2021) concerning Handling of Crimes based on Restorative Justice.
Law Number 4 of (1979) Concerning Child Welfare.
Law Number 11 of (2012) concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System.
Law Number 35 of (2014) Concerning Child Protection.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the journal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
