Implications of Revision of Law No. 19 of 2019 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission for Handling Corruption
Abstract
A constitutional system is an independent state institution that does not belong to any power family (executive, legislative and judicial). However, after the issuance of Law No. 19 of 2019, the institutional format of the KPK changed to become part of the executive family. The author uses a descriptive type of research, which aims for researchers to explain about a legal event or legal situation. By using qualitative analysis methods. In this study, the authors analyze more related to the Revision of the KPK law that has affected the authority of the KPK KPK investigators can no longer conduct wiretapping, search and confiscation without prior permission from the KPK Supervisory Board. This is what makes the position of the KPK ambivalent in the constitutional system, on the one hand the KPK is part of the executive family on the other hand the KPK is independent. The shift in the position of the KPK to become part of the executive clump has implications for the limited space for the KPK in efforts to eradicate corruption, which has the potential to receive various interventions, especially from the executive realm.
Copyright (c) 2022 labib muttaqin, Awhan Ibaad El Adzkiyaa

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright of their published work and grant the International Journal of Social Science Research and Review (IJSSRR) the right of first publication.
Articles published in IJSSRR are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
Authors are permitted to share, archive, and distribute the published version of their work, provided that proper acknowledgement of the original publication in IJSSRR is given.