Juridical Analysis of Fintech Business Dispute Settlement Through Online Dispute Resolution (ODR)

  • Lilies Anisah Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Palembang, Indonesia
Keywords: Juridical; ODR; Fintech

Abstract

The research used in this research process uses type of normative legal research. Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) as an alternative dispute resolution in fintech sector has an urgency to be constructed immediately. First, the philosophical basis states that state supports existence of increasingly developing technologies if they are considered good and bring benefits to society. Second, the sociological basis due for rapid growth of fintech is directly proportional to various legal issues related to fintech disputes. Third, the juridical basis is because regulations related to fintech and Alternative Dispute Resolution (APS) are deemed no longer in accordance with legal developments and community needs,so that stricter regulations are needed and in accordance with legal developments and community needs. The government, the Financial Services Authority, Bank Indonesia and other relevant regulators should pay attention to need to accommodate ODR as an alternative to fintech dispute resolution in various laws and regulations in Indonesia so that there is no legal vacuum (rechtvacuum) and to optimize the basic principles of consumers, namely for efficiency and effectiveness in fintech sector.

References

2021, Penyelesaian Sengketa Jasa Keuangan via LAPS Dilakukan Secara Terintegrasi - Finansial Bisnis.com. (n.d.). Retrieved June 6, 2022, from https://finansial.bisnis.com/read/20201127/90/1323591/2021-penyelesaian-sengketa-jasa-keuangan-via-laps-dilakukan-secara-terintegrasi
Asia Internet Stats by Country and 2022 Population Statistics. (n.d.). Retrieved June 6, 2022, from https://www.internetworldstats.com/asia.htm
Aziz, M. F., & Hidayah, M. A. (2020). PERLUNYA PENGATURAN KHUSUS ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ODR) DI INDONESIA UNTUK FASILITASI PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA E-COMMERCE. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v9i2.449
Daly, P., Gelinas-Faucher, B., Seijas, R., Warchuk, P., Allan, A., Brown, E., Anderson, J., Hannan, L., Humphrey, J., & Pham, L. (n.d.). Cambridge Pro Bono Project 2 Contributors Faculty Cambridge Pro Bono Project-Executive Directors Student Coordinators Student Researchers.
Gerarita Sitompul, M., Syaifuddin, M., & Yahanan, A. (2016). Online Dispute Resolution (Odr): Prospek Penyelesaian Sengketa E-Commerce Di Indonesia. Jurnal Renaissance, 1(2).
Lembaga Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa | Saragih | Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan. (n.d.). Retrieved June 6, 2022, from http://jhp.ui.ac.id/index.php/home/article/view/564
Michael, T., & Boerhan, S. (2020). NEGARA DAN EKSISTENSINYA DALAM PRIVASI SUBJEK HUKUM. Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.30996/jhmo.v3i2.3414
NOTE OF CONFERENCE held by the Centre for Socio-Legal Studies, Oxford on 28 October 2011 sponsored by Swiss Re and the Foundation for Law Justice & Society THE HIDDEN WORLD OF CONSUMER ADR: REDRESS and BEHAVIOUR I. Models of ADR: The Research Findings-Revealing the Hidden World of Consumer ADR in. (n.d.). Retrieved June 6, 2022, from http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/redress_cons/index_en.htm
Penetrasi Internet Indonesia Peringkat 7 di Asia Tenggara | Databoks. (n.d.). Retrieved June 6, 2022, from https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2021/10/13/penetrasi-internet-indonesia-peringkat-7-di-asia-tenggara
Saragi, M. (2014). Litigasi Dan Non Litigasi Untuk Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Dalam Rangka Pengembangan Investasi Di Indonesia. E-Journal Graduate Unpar Part B: Legal Science E-Journal Graduate Unpar Part B: Legal Science, 1(2).
Setiyawan, W. B. M., Churniawan, E., & Rudatyo, R. (2020). ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION SEBAGAI MODEL PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM PELAKU BISNIS. Rechtidee, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.21107/ri.v15i1.7703
Published
2022-08-17
How to Cite
Anisah, L. (2022). Juridical Analysis of Fintech Business Dispute Settlement Through Online Dispute Resolution (ODR). International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 5(8), 344-348. https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v5i8.556