Dualism of Authority to Review Regional Regulations for Regional Taxes and Levies in Indonesia
Abstract
In Indonesia, regional regulation review, particularly regional regulations for taxes and regional levies, has entered a new phase following the passage of Law No. 1 of 2022 about Financial Relations between Central and Regional Governments. In accordance with the provisions of Article 245 of Law No. 23 of 2014 on Regional Government, the regional regulation of regional taxes and levies is one of the regional regulations that must first receive central government approval before being promulgated through a preventive monitoring mechanism while it is still in draft form. This provision is in accordance with the Constitutional Court Decision Number 137/PUU-XIII/2015 and the Constitutional Court Decision Number 56/PUU-XIV/2016 which have eliminated the authority of the central government to be able to carry out repressive supervision, and only allow the application of preventive controls. But then again, following the enactment of Law No. 1 of 2022, the provisions of Article 245 of Law No. 23 of 2014 concerning Regional Government were repealed and repressive supervision was reinstated, especially on regional regulations on regional taxes and levies through Article 99 Paragraph (2) of Law No. 1 of 2022 concerning the Financial Relations of the Central and Regional Governments. This research aims to determine the legal consequences of the enactment of Article 99 Paragraph (2) of Law Number 1 of 2022. This research is normative legal research that employs both a statutory and an analytical method. According to the findings of the author's investigation, Article 99 paragraph (2) of Law No. 1 of 2022 concerning Financial Relations of the Central and Regional Governments is not in accordance with Article 24A paragraph (1) of the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia of 1945, and give rise to Dualism of Authority to review Regional Regulations of Regional Taxes and Levies in Indonesia, and thereby a judicial review must be submitted to the Constitutional Court as soon as possible.
References
Antari, K. W., Windari, R. A., & Mangku, D. G. S. (2020). Tinjauan Yuridis Mengenai Antynomy Normen (Konflik Norma) Antara Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 Tentang Peraturan Dasar-Dasar Pokok Agraria Dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2007 Tentang Penanaman Modal Terkait Jangka Waktu Perolehan Hak Atas Tanah. Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia, 2(2), 88–99.
Apeldoorn, V. (1990). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Cetakan Kedua Puluh Empat. Pradnya Paramita.
Aprianti, N., Safa’at, M. A., & Qurbani, I. D. (2021). Dualisme Model Pengujian Peraturan Daerah Pasca Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 9(2), 472–485.
Asshiddiqie, J., & Safa’at, M. A. (2006). teori Hans Kelsen tentang hukum. Mahkamah Konstitusi RI, Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kenpaniteraan.
Benedikter, T. (2009). The World’s modern autonomy systems. Concepts and Experiences of Regional Territorial Autonomy. Bozen/Bolzano, 305.
BPHN, & Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia. (2021). Hasil Penyelarasan Naskah Akademik Rancangan Undang-Undang tentang Hubungan Keuangan Antara Pemerintah Pusat dan Daerah.
Hannum, H. (2011). Autonomy, sovereignty, and self-determination. In Autonomy, Sovereignty, and Self-Determination. University of Pennsylvania press.
Harefa, B. (2016). Kebenaran Hukum Perspektif Filsafat Hukum. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH), 2(1).
Heintze, H.-J. (1998). On the legal understanding of autonomy. Autonomy: Applications and Implications, 7.
Hutabarat, D. T. H., Fransisca, Z., Ritonga, F., Pardede, D. J., Almas, S., Sikumbang, N. A., Mutiara, Khoiriyah, A., Hamizah, S., Malahayati, & Suryadi. (2022). Understanding and Describing Relationship of State Law and Human Right. Journal of Humanities, Social Sciences and Business (JHSSB), 1(1), 65–72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55047/jhssb.v1i1.63
Indrati, M. F. (2007). Ilmu Perundang-Undangan: Jenis, Fungsi, dan Materi Muatan. Yogyakarta, Penerbit Kanisius.
Irfani, N. (2020). Asas Lex Superior, Lex Specialis, Dan Lex Pesterior: Pemaknaan, Problematika, Dan Penggunaannya Dalam Penalaran Dan Argumentasi Hukum. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 17(3), 305–325.
JDIH MARVES. (2022). Hubungan Keuangan antara Pemerintah Pusat dan Pemerintah Daerah. Biro Hukum Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Kemaritiman Dan Investasi. https://jdih.maritim.go.id/en/hubungan-keuangan-antara-pemerintah-pusat-dan-pemerintah-daerah
Julyano, M., & Sulistyawan, A. Y. (2019). Pemahaman Terhadap Asas Kepastian Hukum Melalui Konstruksi Penalaran Positivisme Hukum. Jurnal Crepido, 1(1), 13–22.
Lapidoth, R. (1997). Autonomy: Flexible Solutions for Ethnic Conflicts. US Institute of Peace Press.
Lapidoth, R. (2001). Elements of Stable Autonomy Solutions. Centrum für angewandte Politikforschung (CAP). http://www.cap.uni-muenchen.de/download/2001/ra/Lapidoth1.pdf
Manan, B. (2004). Hukum Positif Indonesia. Yogyakarta. FH UII Press.
Nalle, V. I. W. (2016). Konstruksi Model Pengujian Ex Ante terhadap Rancangan Undang-Undang di Indonesia. Jurnal Konstitusi, 10(3), 439–460.
Prasetio, T., & Nurdin, M. (2021). Kewenangan Konkuren Pemerintah Daerah Dalam Perizinan Industri Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 tentang Cipta Kerja. Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 9(2), 314–329.
Pratama, W. P. (2022). UU HKPD Terbit, Presiden Kini Bisa Intervensi Langsung Tarif Pajak dan Retribusi Daerah. Bisnis.Com. https://ekonomi.bisnis.com/read/20220112/259/1488367/uu-hkpd-terbit-presiden-kini-bisa-intervensi-langsung-tarif-pajak-dan-retribusi-daerah
Prayogo, T. (2018). Penerapan Asas Kepastian Hukum Dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2011 Tentang Hak Uji Materiil Dan Dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 06/Pmk/2005 Tentang Pedoman Beracara Dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 13(2), 191–201.
Rizky, M. (2022). Sri Mulyani: UU HKPD, Wujud Komitmen Bersama dalam Mensejahterakan Rakyat. Warta Ekonomi. https://wartaekonomi.co.id/read402177/sri-mulyani-uu-hkpd-wujud-komitmen-bersama-dalam-mensejahterakan-rakyat
Siahaan, M. (2016). Uji Konstitusionalitas Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Negara Kita: Masalah dan Tantangan. Jurnal Konstitusi, 7(4), 9–48.
Sofi, I. (2022). Arah Baru Hubungan Keuangan Pemerintah Pusat dan Daerah. Kementrian Keuangan RI. https://djpb.kemenkeu.go.id/portal/id/berita/lainnya/opini/3850-arah-baru-hubungan-keuangan-pemerintah-pusat-dan-daerah.html
Sukriono, D. (2013). Hukum, konstitusi, dan konsep otonomi: kajian politik hukum tentang konstitusi, otonomi daerah, dan desa pasca perubahan konstitusi. Setara Press.
Wibowo, B. N., ALW, L. T., & Hardjanto, U. S. (2021). KEWENANGAN EXECUTIVE REVIEW OLEH BADAN PEMBINAAN HUKUM NASIONAL DALAM PENATAAN REGULASI. Diponegoro Law Journal, 10(1), 69–82.
Wijayanta, T. (2014). Asas kepastian hukum, keadilan dan kemanfaatan dalam kaitannya dengan putusan kepailitan pengadilan niaga. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 14(2), 216–226.
Winata, M. R., Putri, M. C., & Aditya, Z. F. (2018). Legal Historis Kewenangan Pengujian Dan Pembatalan Peraturan Daerah Serta Implikasinya Terhadap Kemudahan Berusaha. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 7(3), 335–352.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the journal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
