The Algorithmic Cage
Artificial Intelligence, Modern Rationalization, and the Inheritors of Max Weber
Abstract
This essay examines, from a sociological and philosophical perspective, the hypothesis that artificial intelligence (AI) constitutes a new phase in the modern rationalization process theorized by Max Weber, and that the metaphor of the iron cage ( stahlhartes Gehäuse ) can be reformulated in contemporary terms as an algorithmic cage. It discusses whether algorithmic systems replace, deepen, or transform classical bureaucratic logic, and examines their effects on subjectivity, power, and freedom. The argument is articulated with contributions from Foucault, Habermas, Zuboff, Han, Srnicek, and Winner, along with recently produced specialized literature (2019–2025). The final thesis maintains that AI does not break the Weberian cage, but rather reconfigures it as a more capillary, opaque, and affectively seductive architecture, although this does not close off the margins of autonomy and democratic resistance.
References
Aradau, C., & Blanke, T. (2022). Algorithmic reason: The new government of self and others. Oxford University Press.
Aristotle. (1995). Physics. Madrid: Gredos.
Crary, J. (2013). 24/7: Late capitalism and the ends of sleep. Verso.
Crawford, K. (2021). Atlas of AI: Power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. Yale University Press.
Creemers, R. (2018). China's social credit system: An evolving practice of control. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3175792 .
Curran, D. (2023). Surveillance capitalism and systemic digital risk: The imperative to collect and connect and the risks of interconnectedness. Big Data & Society, 10(1) , 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517231177621.
Espeland, W. N. (2008). A sociology of quantification. European Journal of Sociology, 49(3) , 401–436.
Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. St. Martin's Press.
Foucault, M. (1977). Il faut défendre la société. Cours au College de France. Paris: Gallimard/Seuil.
Foucault, M. (2002). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI Editores.
Foucault, M. (2010). The courage of truth: the government of self and others II. Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Habermas, J. (1987). Theory of Communicative Action (Vols. 1–2). Taurus.
Han, B.-C. (2014). Psychopolitics. Neoliberalism and new techniques of power. Barcelona: Herder.
Liang, F. D. (2018). Constructing a data-driven society: China's social credit system as a state surveillance infrastructure. Policy & Internet, 10(4) , 415–453.
Mau, S. (2019). The metric society: On the quantification of the social. Polity Press.
Mejias, UA (2024). Data grab: The new colonialism of Big Tech and how to fight back. University of Chicago Press.
Mökander, J., & Schroeder, R. (2024). Artificial intelligence, rationalization, and the limits of control in the public sector: The case of tax policy optimization. Social Science Computer Review, 42(6), , 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393241235175.
Muellerleile, C., & Robertson, S. L. (2018). Digital Weberianism: Bureaucracy, information, and the techno-rationality of neoliberal capitalism. Journal of Global Legal Studies, 25(1), , 187–216.
European Parliament and Council of the European Union. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 on harmonised rules in the field of artificial intelligence (AI Act). Official Journal of the European Union.
Quiroga, S. (2020). Psychopolitics, swarm, mediatization and digital communication in Byung-Chul Han: An initial critique. Revista Investigación y Desarrollo (UNSL), 12 , 95–115.
Rouvroy, A. (2016). Algorithmic governmentality and perspectives of emancipation: Disparity as a condition of individuation through relationship? Philosophical Addendum, 1 , 88–116.
Schluchter, W. (2017). The Disenchantment of the World: Six Studies on Max Weber. Bogotá: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Schroeder, R. (2023). Rationalization revisited: From Weber to digital capitalism. Routledge.
Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform capitalism. Polity Press.
Susen, S. (2018). Jürgen Habermas: Between Democratic Deliberation and Deliberative Democracy. In R. &. Wodak, The Routledge Handbook of Language and Politics (pp. 43-66). Abingdon: Routledge https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/18941/.
UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
Vogl, T. M. (2020). Smart technology and the emergence of algorithmic bureaucracy: Artificial intelligence in UK local authorities. Public Administration Review, 80(6) , 946-961.
Watson, D. S. (2023). In defense of sociotechnical pragmatism. AI & Society, 38(4) , 1–14.
Weber, M. (1949). The Methodology of the Social Sciences. Illinois: The Free Press of Glencoe.
Weber, M. (1976). Politics and Science. Buenos Aires: Editorial La Pleyade.
Weber, M. (2012). Economy and society. Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Weber, M. (2012). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Weber, M. (2012). Sociology of religion. Madrid: Akal.
Williams, J. (2018). Stand out of our light: Freedom and resistance in the attention economy. Cambridge University Press.
Winner, L. (1980). Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus, 109(1) , 121–136.
Yeung, K. (2018). Algorithmic regulation: A critical interrogation. Regulation & Governance, 12(4), , 505–523.
Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.
Zuboff, S. (2022). Surveillance capitalism or democracy? The death match of institutional orders and the politics of knowledge in our information civilization. Organization Theory, 3(3) , 1–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877221129290.
