Struggles Beyond the Borders: The Human Cost of Geopolitical Settings

  • Dr. Dawinder Kaur Assistant Professor, PG. Dept of Political Science & Public Administration Khalsa College Amritsar, Punjab, India https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9070-4447
Keywords: Financial Technology; Financial Literacy; Financial Inclusion

Abstract

The partition of British India into two independent sovereign nations marked a decisive turning point in the demographic, political, and geopolitical history of the subcontinent. Its consequences have been deep-rooted, enduring, and continually unfolding over time. Among the most significant outcomes of partition was the creation of international borders that conferred sovereign authority on the newly formed states. While these borders became central to state identity and national security, they also produced long-term vulnerabilities for populations residing in border regions. Borders, though essential for maintaining territorial integrity, often function as zones of tension and conflict. The boundary between India and Pakistan remains one of the most volatile and contested international borders in the world. Since independence, the Indian state has consistently prioritised border security, particularly along the Punjab sector, owing to its strategic and historical significance. However, the emphasis on militarisation and surveillance has disproportionately affected the everyday lives of borderland residents. These communities continue to suffer due to hostile bilateral relations, unresolved territorial disputes, and recurring episodes of cross-border tensions. The people living in these regions face persistent hardships, caught between stringent security measures imposed by the state and recurring threats such as cross-border firing, infiltration attempts, and military standoffs. Their lives are marked by uncertainty, disruption, and fear. This article critically examines the challenges experienced by residents of Punjab’s borderlands, with particular focus on repeated episodes of temporary displacement caused by wars, armed conflicts, and heightened diplomatic tensions between India and Pakistan. Based on primary data collected from inhabitants of the border regions of Punjab, the study reveals that residents have been compelled to vacate their homes multiple times in response to escalating tensions and security emergencies. Such forced and recurrent displacement has severe implications for livelihoods, education, social networks, and psychological well-being. The findings highlight that the normal functioning of daily life in these borderlands remains highly fragile and is largely contingent upon the prevailing security situation along the international border. Consequently, borderland communities continue to exist in a state of perpetual insecurity, shaped by forces beyond their control.

References

Adesina, O. S. (2019). Conceptualising borders and borderlands in a globalising world. Journal of Social Issues, 22(1), 203.
Anderson, J., & O’Dowd, L. (1999). Borders, border regions and territoriality: Contradictory meanings, changing significance. Regional Studies, 33(7), 593-604.
Banerjee, P. (2018). Borders, histories, existences: Gender and beyond. SAGE Publications.
Basci, Z., & Kovaes, E. (2006). Role of cross-border cooperation in rural development. Journal of Central European Agriculture, 7(4), 152.
Baud, M., & Van Schendel, W. (1997). Towards a comparative history of borderlands. Journal of World History, 8(2), 211–242.
Bedi, R. (2003, February). Picking mines on the border. Frontline. Retrieved from https://frontline.thehindu.com/the-nation/article30215488.ece
Bose, S. (2003). The nation as mother and other visions of nationhood.
Chatterjee, R. K. (1978). India's land borders: Problems and challenges. Sterling.
Cheema, M. J. (2015). Pakistan-India conflict with special reference to Kashmir. South Asian Studies, 30(1), 45-69.
Chester, L. (2002, February). American Diplomacy. Retrieved from https://web.unc.edu
Commonwealth Forum. (2019, September 9-12). Edinburgh, Scotland.
Dalrymple, W. (2015). The great divide. The New Yorker, 39.
Dutt, S. (2000). War & peace in Kargil sector. A.P.H. Publishing Corporation.
Ganguly, R. (1998). India, Pakistan, and the Kashmir dispute. Asian Studies Institute & Centre for Strategic Studies, Victoria University of Wellington.
Ganguly, S. (2002). Conflict unending: India-Pakistan tensions since 1947. Columbia University Press.
Garver, J. W. (2006). China’s decision for war with India. In A. Johnson & R. S. Ross (Eds.), New directions in the study of China’s foreign policy (pp. 107-108). Stanford University Press.
Ghulam, Q., Ishaque, W., & Shah, S. (2017). Kashmir crisis: A critical analysis of Indo-Pak intercession. Global Social Science Review (GSSR, 2(1), 67-78.
Godbole, M. (2001). Management of India’s international borders. Economic and Political Weekly, 36(48), 4442-4444.
Grosz, G. (2022). The long shadow of Kargil War: The effect of early-life stress on education. HICN: Households in Conflict Network, Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex.
Hiranandani, G. M. (2000). Transition to triumph: History of the Indian Navy, 1965-1975. Lancer Publishers.
Kaur, D. (2018). Mapping the impact of border on farmers: Evidence from Punjab. Research Journal Social Sciences, 26(1&2).
Kaur, D. (2024). Structural exclusion and farmers: Empirical observations from borderlands. Book Enclave.
Kumar, S. (2018). Challenges of border management and migration in Punjab. EPRA International Journal of Economic and Business Review, 6(3), 39.
Laczko, F. (2005). Data and research on human trafficking: A global survey. International Organization for Migration.
Lahiri, I. (2019, September 9-12). Promoting rural development in border disturbed regions of India through inclusive growth in agriculture by using open and distance learning technologies. Pan-Commonwealth Forum, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Leaning, J., Bhadada, S., & Hewett, M. (2022). Introduction. In The partition of British India: Forced migration and its reverberations (p. 1). Sage.
Panday, A. (2011). The stability-instability paradox: The case of the Kargil war. Penn State University Journal of Internal Affairs, 1(1), 7.
Parker, G. (2006). Geopolitics: Past, present, and future. Continuum.
Prescott, J. R. V. (1972). Political geography. Methuen and Co. Ltd.
Raghavan, S. (2010). War and peace in modern India: A strategic history of Nehru years. Ranikhet: Permanent Black.
Reed, H. E., Ludwig, B., & Braslow, L. (2016). Forced migration. In J. M. White (Ed.), International handbook of migration and population distribution. Springer.
Saddiki, S. (2017). Border fencing in India. In World of walls: The structure, roles, and effectiveness of separation barriers. Open Book Publishers.
Schendel, W. V. (2005). The Bengal borderland: Beyond state and nation in South Asia. Anthem Press.
Sekhon, J. S. (2014). Mapping social exclusion in India: Caste, religion, and borderlands. In P. S. Judge (Ed.), Cambridge University Press.
Singh, B., Singh, S., & Brar, J. (2004). Border risk and unemployment dynamics. Punjabi University.
Singh, S. (2017). India’s war: A military history 1947-1971. Harper Collins.
Statesman. (2010, May 24). Borders as flashpoints.
Talbot, I., & Singh, G. (2009). The partition of India. Cambridge University Press.
Talbot, I., & Singh, G. (2009). The Partition of India. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/...
Tellis, A. J., Fair, C. C., & Medby, J. J. (2001). Limited conflicts under the nuclear umbrella: Indian and Pakistani lessons from the Kargil crisis. RAND Corporation.
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (2008).
Van Schendel, W., & Baud, M. (1997). Towards a comparative history of borderlands. Journal of World History, 8(2), 198.
Wilson, T. M., & Donnan, H. (1994). Border approaches: Anthropological perspectives on frontiers. University Press of America.
Zamindar, V. F. (2007). The long partition and the making of modern South Asia: Refugees, boundaries, histories. Columbia University Press.
Published
2026-01-21
How to Cite
Kaur, D. D. (2026). Struggles Beyond the Borders: The Human Cost of Geopolitical Settings. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 9(2), 286-296. https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v9i2.3226