Investigating the Role of Anonymity in Online Insensitivity Among Teenagers
Abstract
In the current digital era, cyberbullying, defined as the intentional use of digital platforms to inflict harm on other users through hostile and aggressive behaviour, has grown to be a very serious concern. As everyone has started to increasingly rely on social media for communication and a main source of entertainment, especially amongst adolescents, incidents of online harassment and emotional abuse have grown rapidly. One factor often associated with cyberbullying is anonymity. It is the power that individuals have to conceal their true identity when communicating online. This lack of identification can create a sense of detachment and reduce personal accountability. The perceived protection offered by anonymity can lower the threshold for socially unacceptable actions, making it simpler for people to bully, harass or intimidate others in online spaces without worrying about the repercussions. The present study explores the impact of anonymity on insensitive behaviour and cyberbullying among teenagers in the Indian subcontinent. Sixty participants (30 anonymous, 30 non-anonymous) were selected using convenience sampling, and data were collected through online surveys where participants had to rate insensitivity in troll comments on a scale of 1-5, with 5 being the most insensitive. The research followed a quantitative design. The findings revealed that there was no significant distinction between the anonymous and non-anonymous groups' overall responses, suggesting that anonymity alone may not drive online insensitivity. However, significant differences in the reaction were seen in passive-aggressive and personal insults, such as “Remember when you were thin?” and “Having a brain would be a good start,”. Limitations included a small, geographically limited sample and gender imbalance. In order to fully understand the complex connection between anonymity and online activity, future research should include larger, more varied populations.
References
2. Anonymity. (2025). In Merriam-Webster Dictionary. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/anonymity
3. Bernstein, M. S., Monroy-Hernández, A., Harry, D., André, P., Panovich, K., & Vargas, G. G. (2011). 4chan and /b/: An analysis of anonymity and ephemerality in a large online community. In the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. https://aaai.org/papers/00050-14134-4chan-and-b-an-analysis-of-anonymity-and-ephemerality-in-a-large-online-community/
4. Bing. (n.d.). Where is cyberbullying most common? https://www.bing.com/search?q=Where+is+cyberbullying+most+common
5. Christopherson, K. M. (2006). The positive and negative implications of anonymity in Internet social interactions: “On the Internet, Nobody Knows You’re a Dog.” Computers in Human Behaviour, 23(6), 3038–3056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2006.09.001
6. Cyberbullying Research Centre. (2024, September 12). Cyberbullying Facts. https://cyberbullying.org/facts
7. Emmanuel, S. M., & McDonald, W. (2016). Volume 15, Tome I: Kierkegaard’s Concepts. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315234779
8. Englander, E. (2021). Bullying, Cyberbullying, Anxiety, and Depression in a Sample of Youth during the Coronavirus Pandemic. Pediatric Reports, 13(3), 546–551. https://doi.org/10.3390/pediatric13030064
9. Fox, J., & Tang, W. Y. (2016). Women’s experiences with general and sexual harassment in online video games: Rumination, organisational responsiveness, withdrawal, and coping strategies. New Media & Society, 19(8), 1290–1307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816635778
10. GeeksforGeeks. (2025, April 11). What is a VPN? How It Works, Types of VPN. GeeksforGeeks. https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/what-is-vpn-how-it-works-types-of-vpn/
11. Hinduja, S. (2024, June 26). Generative AI as a vector for harassment and harm. Cyberbullying Research Centre. https://cyberbullying.org/generative-ai-as-a-vector-for-harassment-and-harm
12. Hutson, E. (2016). Cyberbullying in adolescence. Advances in Nursing Science, 39(1), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1097/ans.0000000000000104
13. John, A., Glendenning, A. C., Marchant, A., Montgomery, P., Stewart, A., Wood, S., Lloyd, K., & Hawton, K. (2018). Self-Harm, Suicidal Behaviours, and Cyberbullying in Children and Young People: Systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(4), e129. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9044
14. Joinson, A. N. (2001). Self‐disclosure in computer‐mediated communication: The role of self‐awareness and visual anonymity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31(2), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.36
15. Lapidot-Lefler, N., & Barak, A. (2011). Effects of anonymity, invisibility, and lack of eye contact on toxic online disinhibition. Computers in Human Behaviour, 28(2), 434–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.014
16. Moore, M. J., Nakano, T., Enomoto, A., & Suda, T. (2012). Anonymity and roles associated with aggressive posts in an online forum. Computers in Human Behaviour, 28(3), 861–867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.12.005
17. Qian, H., & Scott, C. R. (2007). Anonymity and Self-Disclosure on Weblogs. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1428–1451. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00380.x
18. Setiabudi, R., Mani, L., Willeim, D., & Situmorang, W. (2023). Anonymous and online hate speech when the government raised subsidised fuel prices: An analysis of the Instagram account of a state-owned company. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 101(24), 3674–3682. https://www.jatit.org/volumes/Vol101No24/3Vol101No24.pdf
19. Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. CyberPsychology & Behaviour, 7(3), 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1089/1094931041291295
20. UNICEF. (2024, February). How to stop cyberbullying. https://www.unicef.org/stories/how-to-stop-cyberbullying
21. Varley, D. (2025). Seeking Anonymity in Online Spaces: How Anonymous Motivations Predict our Social Media Usage and Online Behaviour. Uq. https://doi.org/10.1037/XXXXXXX
22. Waasdorp, T. E., & Bradshaw, C. P. (2015). The Overlap Between Cyberbullying and Traditional Bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 56(5), 483–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.12.002
23. Westfall, J. (2013). Anonymity. In Volume 15, Tome I: Kierkegaard’s Concepts. Routledge.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the journal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
