Transitions in Gender Roles in Contemporary India: A Cross-Generational Analysis
Abstract
This study explores how gender roles in India have evolved across generations, focusing on the perceptions of young adults and middle-aged adults living in Delhi and the NCR. Using a qualitative design and a semi-structured interview format, data were collected from 80 participants (40 aged 18–30 and 40 aged 40+). Responses were thematically analyzed, revealing seven major themes: typical roles, desirable characteristics, moral ethics, career expectations, societal norms, safety, and additional personality traits. Findings indicate both continuity and change in gender role expectations. While traditional role beliefs such as nurturing females and financially responsible males remain prominent, younger participants demonstrated more egalitarian views regarding personality traits, career aspirations, and gender equality. The study highlights a gradual transition toward flexibility in gender roles, though longstanding societal norms continue to influence expectations. These results underscore the need for further research on how cultural, generational, and social factors shape evolving gender identities in contemporary India.
References
Adler, P., Kless, S., & Adler, P. (1992). Socialization to Gender Roles: Popularity among Elementary School Boys and Girls. Sociology of Education, 65(3), 169-087.
Baron-Cohen, S (2003). The Essential Difference: Men, Women and the Extreme Male Brain. London: Penguin/Basic Books.
Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise on the Sociology of Knowledge. London:Penguin.
Cahill, S. E. (1986). Language Practices and Self-definition: The Case of Gender Identity Acquisition. The Sociological Quarterly, 27(3), 295-311.
Cherlin, A. J. (2010). Public and Private Families: An Introduction. (6th ed.) 93, New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and Power. Stanford University Press.
Eagly, A. H. (1997). Sex Differences in Social Behavior: Comparing Social Role Theory and Evolutionary Psychology. American Psychologist, 52(12), 1380-1383.
Frieze, I. H., Parsons, J. E., Johnson, P. B., Ruble, D. N., & Zellman, G. L. (1978). Women and Sex Roles. New York: Norton & Company, Inc.
Kiger, G., & Riley, P. J. (1996). Gender Differences in Perceptions of Household Labor. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 130(4), 357-370.
Maccoby, E. E, & D'Andrade, R. G. (1966). The Development of Sex Differences, 5. Stanford University Press.
Marecek, J., Crawford, M., & Popp, D. (2004). On the Construction of Gender, Sex, and Sexualities. In A. H. Eagly, A. E. Beall, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of gender (2nd ed., pp. 192–216). The Guilford Press.
Martin, C. L., Ruble, D. N., & Szkrybalo, J. (2002). Cognitive Theories of Early Gender Development. Psychological Bulletin, 128(6), 903-933.
Money, J., Hampson, J. G., & Hampson, J. L. (1955). An Examination of Some basic Sexual Concepts: The Evidence of Human Hermaphroditism. Bulletin of the Johns Hopkins Hospital, 97(4), 301-319.
Pinker, S. (2002). The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature, 202. New York: Penguin Books.
Ruble, D. N., & Martin, C. L. (1998). Gender Development. Handbook of Child Psychology, Social, Emotional, and Personality Development (5th ed.), 933-1016. New York: Wiley.
Rudman, L., & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive Gender Stereotypes and Backlash toward Agentic Women. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 743-762.
West, C., & Fenstermaker, S. (1995). Doing Difference. Gender & Society, 9(1), 8-37.
Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2002). A Cross-cultural Analysis of the Behavior of Women and Men: Implications for the Origins of Sex Differences. Psychological Bulletin, 128(5), 699-727.
Zell, E., Krizan, Z., & Teeter, S. R. (2015). Evaluating Gender Similarities and Differences using Metasynthesis. The American Pychologist, 70(1), 10-20.
Copyright (c) 2026 Anjali Mittal, Muskaan Bhatia, Vani Jain

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the journal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).