Marxist Perspectives on Educational Inequality in Zimbabwean Primary and Secondary Schools

  • Isaac Mutelo Lecturer and Director of Quality Assurance/Research, Innovation and Publication, Arrupe Jesuit University, Zimbabwe
  • Yvonne Sanyanga Lecturer, Arrupe Jesuit University, Zimbabwe
Keywords: Marxist Theory; Educational Inequality; Class Reproduction; Ideology; Curriculum

Abstract

This paper applies Marxist theory to analyse educational inequality in Zimbabwean primary and secondary schools. Drawing on the foundational work of Karl Marx and later theorists such as Althusser, Bowles and Gintis, the study argues that Zimbabwe’s education system systematically reproduces class-based disparities rooted in broader socio-economic structures. Using a conceptual methodology and illustrative case studies such as elite urban institutions and under-resourced rural schools, the paper highlights how curriculum design, ideological messaging and unequal access to resources disproportionately benefit learners from privileged backgrounds. The analysis shows that while Zimbabwe's post-independence reforms expanded access to education, they failed to address deep-rooted structural inequalities. The education system continues to serve as an ideological and material instrument for class reproduction, aligning with capitalist labour demands and sustaining elite dominance. Although Marxist theory has limitations, particularly in accounting for other forms of identity-based exclusion such as gender and ethnicity, it remains a powerful framework for interrogating educational injustice in postcolonial societies. The paper concludes with recommendations for curriculum reform, equitable resource distribution, and the promotion of critical pedagogy to foster a more inclusive and socially just education system.

References

Althusser, L. (1971). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. In L. Althusser & P. Balibar (Eds.), Reading capital (pp. 85–126). Verso.

Bhoroma, T. (2019). Hegemony and education in Zimbabwe: An analysis of cultural dominance. Zimbabwe Journal of Education Studies, 15(2), 45–60.

Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood.

Desfor, G., & Appelrouth, S. (2015). Marxist theory and education. In G. Desfor & S. Appelrouth (Eds.), Social & cultural theories in education. Routledge.

Dzvimbo, V., & Moloi, M. (2013). Challenges facing rural secondary schools in Zimbabwe. African Education Review, 10(1), 78–92.

Mlambo, V. (2019). Educational resource disparities in Zimbabwe: A case study of Harare schools. Journal of African Education, 22(4), 123–137.

Mupinga, R., & Bukaliya, R. (2022). Youth unemployment and the relevance of vocational education in Zimbabwe. Zimbabwe National Statistics Agency Report. Retrieved April 15, 2025, from https://zimbabwe.statistics.gov.zw

Johnson, N. (2024, September 11). Marxism – some key strengths, some key weaknesses, and some dangers. The Political Economy of Development. Retrieved June 20, 2025, from https://peofdev.wordpress.com/2024/09/11/marxism-some-key-strengths-some-key-weaknesses-and-some-dangers/

Ndawi, N., & Maravanyika, K. (2011). Western knowledge systems in Zimbabwean curricula: An elitist perspective. Zimbabwe Journal of Education, 19(3), 87–102.

Nherera, M. (2000). Curriculum reform and rural education in Zimbabwe. International Journal of Educational Development, 20(2), 115–128.

Tikly, L. (2004). Education and social justice in Zimbabwe: Challenges of post-colonial reform. International Journal of Educational Development, 24(2), 145–157.

UNICEF Zimbabwe. (2021). Poverty and psychosocial well-being among rural learners. UNICEF.

UNICEF Zimbabwe. (2022). Education dropout rates and contributing factors. UNICEF.

Perera, A. (2024, February 13). Criticism of Marxism. Simply Psychology. Reviewed by S. McLeod, PhD & O. Guy-Evans, MSc. Retrieved May 5, 2025, from https://www.simplypsychology.org/criticism-of-marxism.html

Zimbabwe Ministry of Education. (2019). Education policy framework. Government of Zimbabwe.

Zimbabwe Ministry of Education. (2020). Education sector strategic plan 2020–2025. Government of Zimbabwe.

Zimbabwe Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education. (2015–2022). Curriculum framework for primary and secondary education. Government of Zimbabwe.

Zimbabwe National Statistics Agency. (2022). Youth unemployment report. Retrieved April 15, 2025, from https://zimbabwe.statistics.gov.zw

Published
2025-09-25
How to Cite
Mutelo, I., & Sanyanga, Y. (2025). Marxist Perspectives on Educational Inequality in Zimbabwean Primary and Secondary Schools. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 8(10), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v8i10.2885