Paradox or Paradigm? Enhancing Leadership Development Planning for the Succession of Educational Leaders in the Caribbean

  • Cerease Gillian Nevins-Bennett Turks and Caicos Islands Community College, Turks and Caicos Islands
Keywords: Adaptability; Innovation; Leadership Development Programs; Paradox; Paradigm; Succession Planning

Abstract

The succession of educational leaders in the ever-changing Caribbean higher educational landscape has been a persistent challenge. The significant challenge is the dichotomous tension between preparing educational leaders for future leadership roles and preparing them with the skills needed to adapt to the rapidly changing environment of contemporary educational leadership practices. This issue represents a paradox, which is the contradictory truth between the traditional leadership status quo and the prioritization of innovation through their leadership practices.  In leadership development, there is a paradigmatic shift in the frameworks and assumptions that guide the actions of effective educational leaders. The purpose of this study is to examine the existing literature and strategies on how leadership development programs in the Caribbean higher educational institutions balance the paradox of tradition versus innovation in preparing educational leaders and examine how leadership succession planning frameworks can be adapted to address the paradox of ensuring organizational stability while fostering adaptability. A systematic review methodology was used for this study. The qualitative literature extraction was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. (PRISMA) 2020 checklist. This checklist consists of twenty-seven items which were used to guide the reporting quality of the study. Data was extracted from Google Scholar, ResearchGate, Academia.edu. EBSCO, Web of Science, and Scopus. Thirty-two studies were included in the systematic review based on inclusion criteria. The results showed a lack of leadership development programs for the succession of educational leaders in most Caribbean countries. There was a lack of consensus on how to balance the paradox of traditional leadership versus innovative leadership. Most literature called for a paradigm shift in using more contemporary models and frameworks to guide the succession process.  It was concluded that paradoxes can hinder the development of future leaders, and whilst there are paradigmatic issues in maintaining modern leadership development programs this may lead to a succession crisis in educational institutions. The way forward is to provide future programs to enhance training, mentorship, and a model framework for enhancing leadership capabilities.

 

 

 

References

Attamimi, R, Abidin, A., & Amiruddin, A. (2024). Integrating Artificial Intelligence into succession planning and leadership development in higher education. International Conference of Business and Social Sciences. http://doi.org/10.24034/icobuss.v4i1.496.

Baban, S. (2025). A strategic approach for making higher education institutions relevant and viable through engaged learning and teaching based on graduate employability profiles. Athens Journal of Education, 12(1), 23-38.

Bano, Y., Omar, S.S., & Ismail, F. (2023). Challenges in implementing succession planning in higher education institutions. Journal of Chemical Health Risks, 13(4), 754-760.

Barrett-Maitland, N., Williams-Shakespeare, F., Allen, D., & Edwards-Braham, S. (2025). From tradition to innovation: Proposing agile leadership as the new paradigm for a higher education institution in a developing country. Power and Education, 17(2) 255–278.

Buckway, A. J. (2020). Perception of leaders regarding succession planning in state universities in a western state, [Doctoral Dissertation. Walden University.

Bunescu, L., Estermann, T., Decancq, K., Harðardóttir, F., & Verlaeckt, K. (2023). Implementing leadership development programmes for university leaders. An inspirational guide. European University Association.

Chaturvedi, V. (2016). Talent analytics as an indispensable tool and an emerging facet of HR for organizational building. FIIB Business Review, 5(3), 13-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/2455265820160302.

Cohall, D. H. (2021). Mentorship: A pathway to build academic resilience and foster transformative development of the Caribbean academics and their communities in an evolving higher education climate. West Indian Medical Journal, 69 (2), 66-68.

Dahlan, D. A., Omar, R., Kamarundi, S., & Nasar, A. (2021). A systematic review of succession planning in higher education. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 8(12), 80-92. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2021.12.010.

Gupta, P. B., Dubey, P., Dave, T., & Gupta, B. L. (2024). Strategies to improve succession planning in higher education. Mazedan International Business Review, 5(2), 9–16.

Hoque, K. E., & Zheng, C. (2024). Succession planning in higher education: A systematic Literature review (2012-2122). Human Resource Management and Services, 6(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.18282/hrms.v6i1.3391.

Hubahib, S. B. (2024). Systematic review on the 21st century school leadership: A strategic model. International Multidisciplinary Journal of Research for innovation, Sustainability, and Excellence, 1(10), 268-280. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13923052.

Horvath, Z., Wilder, R. S., & Guthmiller, J. M. (2024). The power of coaching: Developing leaders and beyond. Journal of Dental Education, 671-677. https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.13535.

Jarvi, K., & Khoreva, V. (2020). The role of talent management in strategic renewal. Employee Relations: The international Journal, 42(1), 75-89. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-02-2018-0064.

Kets De Vries, M. (2008). Leadership coaching and organizational transformation: Effectiveness in a world of paradoxes. [Faculty and Research working paper].

Leithwood, K. (2017). Leadership for school improvement. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 24(2), 147-158.

Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. National College for School Leadership.

Litz, D., & Blaik-Hourani, R. (2020, June 30). Transformational leadership and change in education. Education. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.631.

Mahusain, M. A., Nair, S. K., & Francis, r. S. (2023). Intrinsic and extrinsic factors associated with succession planning and management (SP&M) process: A PRISMA systematic review. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(6), 2222-6990.

Miller, P. (2016). Caribbean perspectives - Developing successful and effective school leadership (pp. 81-91). In: Successful school leadership international perspectives. Bloomsbury, London, UK.

Muslim, S., Haron, S., & Hashim, R. (November 2012). Talent pool management, succession planning, or replacement planning? Finding a fit for public universities: The initial finding. Proceedings of International Conference on Public Policy and Social Science, UiTM Melaka Malaysia.

Ncube, L., Mahlangu, S., Kamango, K., Ncube, N. M., Moyo, M., Phiri, T., & Nemashakwe, P. (2024). The role of agile leadership in the success of a contemporary organisation: A conceptual discussion. International Journal of Management Studies and Social Science Research, 6(6), 7-19. https://doi.org/10.56293/IJMSSSR.2024.5302.

Niknamian, S. (2020). Presentation of a model for a competency-based succession planning model with respect to adjusting role of organizational culture in Telecommunication.

Infrastructure Company of Iran (TICIR). Britain International of Exact Sciences Journal, 2(1), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.33258/bioex.v2i1.105.

Ogunbukola, M. (2024). Global imperatives: navigating the opportunities and challenges of AI Governance. 1-13.

Paul, G. (2007). Linking Caribbean higher education research to institutional administrative capacity building. The current ACHEA focus. UNESCO Forum on Higher Education, Research and Knowledge, 1-12.

Penn, D. M. (2025). Phased leadership succession in higher education: a strategic, cost‐efficient transition model. LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/phased-leadership-succession-higher-education-strategic-penn--4pcjc/.

Society for Human resource Management (2015). Succession planning competencies. Retrieved from http://www.shrm.org/communities/volunteerresources/pages/succplg.aspx.

Soltis, J. (2019). "Predictive analytics and succession planning." Journal of Talent Management, 35(2), 133-145.

Stefani, L. (2015). Stepping up to leadership in higher education. All Ireland Journal of Teaching and learning in Higher Education, 7(1), 2161-2168.

Talodhikar, S., & Farooque, s. (2025). Utilizing artificial intelligence for competency mapping and personalized skill development in IT organizations. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, 10(15s), 2468-4376.

Villamor, M. R., Pecson, G., Arcilla, L., Bacus, J., Abando, A., Bigcas, B., & Quinco-Cadosales,

M. N. (2021). A meta-synthesis on school leadership succession: Groundwork for effective transition. Multicultural Education, 8(5), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6544657.

Wilson, P. M. (2021). Succession planning strategies at the Ministry of Education in the Bahamas [Doctoral Dissertation]. Grand Canyon University.

Zalfqar, A., Valcke, M. Quraishi, U., & Devos, G. (2021). Developing academic leaders: Evaluation of a leadership development intervention in higher education. Sage Open, 11(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244021991.

Published
2025-08-22
How to Cite
Nevins-Bennett, C. (2025). Paradox or Paradigm? Enhancing Leadership Development Planning for the Succession of Educational Leaders in the Caribbean. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 8(8), 262-272. https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v8i8.2882