The Decision of the Civil Case Court Acts of Default at the Cassation Level in the Convention's Lawsuit to Punish the Cassation/Plaintiff (Case Study No.91/Pdt.G/2021/PN.Plg)
Abstract
This case focuses on a court decision regarding default that occurs in the context of convention lawsuits. In case No. 91/Pdt.G/2021/PN.Plg, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Defendant who was suspected of violating the agreed agreement. The Defendant's failure to execute the obligations outlined in the agreement was determined by the Palembang District Court to be a default. The Supreme Court reviewed the decision during the cassation stage to verify that the legal substances and procedures were applied appropriately. The defendant's appeal was denied by the Supreme Court, which underscored the appropriateness of the previous court's decision. The Defendant is required to reimburse the Plaintiff for the sum of money received as compensation for default, according to the court. This is consistent with the regulations of Article 1238 of the Civil Code, which governs default and its repercussions. This decision has a significant impact on the parties involved, as the Defendant was legally obligated to fulfill his obligations. Furthermore, this decision establishes precedents for other default cases, emphasizing the significance of adhering to mutually agreed-upon agreements. Case No. 91/PDT.G/2021/PN.PLG is a noteworthy illustration of civil law enforcement in the context of default. The Indonesian legal system's dedication to safeguarding the rights of parties who are underprivileged in the agreement is reaffirmed by the Supreme Court Decision, which also underscores the significance of all parties fulfilling their contractual obligations.
References
F. G. Pomar and S. C. Perarnau, “Commentary on the Decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union of June 15, 2023, C-520/21 (Bank M.): nullity of the contract arising from unfair terms and constraints on lender’s claims in restitution,” InDret, no. 3, 2023.
A. Amriwan, K. Warman, and H. Andora, “Settlement of Land Pawn Disputes Through Courts in West Sumatra,” Int. J. Multicult. …, 2020.
A. R. Hasanah, N. Ihwanudin, and M. A. Ibrahim, “Analisis Hukum terhadap Putusan Perkara Nomor 5530/Pdt.G/2017/Pa.Badg Akibat Wanprestasi Nasabah pada Pembiayaan Akad Musyarakah,” Bandung Conf. Ser. Sharia Econ. Law, vol. 2, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.29313/bcssel.v2i1.163.
N. H. M. P. Pitanuki, “Executions of Fiduciaryry Guarantee Post Constitutional Court Decision No. Nomor: 18/Puu-Xvii/2019,” Constitutionale, vol. 1, no. 2, 2020, doi: 10.25041/constitutionale.v1i2.2173.
C. Engel, “Lucky you: Your case is heard by a seasoned panel—Panel effects in the German Constitutional Court,” J. Empir. Leg. Stud., vol. 19, no. 4, 2022, doi: 10.1111/jels.12327.
C. N. Sarika, S. Sunarmi, D. Harianto, and R. H. Siahaan, “Juridicial Analysis on The Implementation of Fiduciary Collateral Execution in The Post-The Constituonal Court’s Ruling No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019,” Syiah Kuala Law J., vol. 5, no. 3, 2021, doi: 10.24815/sklj.v5i3.23030.
Á. Suárez-Collado and D. Contini, “The European Court of Justice on the EU-Morocco agricultural and fisheries agreements: an analysis of the legal proceedings and consequences for the actors involved,” J. North African Stud., vol. 27, no. 6, 2022, doi: 10.1080/13629387.2021.1917122.
Siswo Pranoto and Widyawatie Boediningsih, “Legal Consequences of Marriage Agreements Separation of Property Against Calculations Income Tax,” YURISDIKSI J. Wacana Huk. dan Sains, vol. 18, no. 3, 2022, doi: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v18i3.151.
A. Umami, B. Rahmasari, and Y. Melani, “JURIDICAL REVIEW THE VALIDITY OF THE AGREEMENT ON PEER TO PEER LENDING SERVICES,” Otentik’s J. Huk. Kenotariatan, vol. 5, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.35814/otentik.v5i1.4583.
P. A. S. Wesna, I. B. D. Jusarata, and J. I. Kosasih, “The Legal Consequences of Debtor Transfer Carried out under the Agreement, House Ownership Loans,” J. Huk. Prasada, vol. 9, no. 2, 2022, doi: 10.22225/jhp.9.2.2022.86-97.
W. B. Bittar, L. A. Borri, and J. P. T. A. Senedesi, “COOPERATION AGREEMENT AND CONFIDENTIALITY: ANALYSIS OF THE LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF UNDUE DISCLOSURE OF THE AGREEMENT AND THE CONTENT OF THE DELATOR’S STATEMENTS IN PERSPECTIVE OF THE ANTI-CRIME PACKAGE,” Rev. Eletronica Direito Process., vol. 23, no. 2, 2022, doi: 10.12957/redp.2022.60365.
S. Sumiati and A. Akmaliyah, “THE IMPLEMENTATION OF MUSYARAKAH FINANCING IN ISLAMIC BANKS IN INDONESIA IN RELATION TO DEFAULTS BUSINESS PARTNERS,” AKSY J. Ilmu Akunt. dan Bisnis Syariah, vol. 6, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.15575/aksy.v6i1.33163.
F. P. N. Setiawan and J. C. Mantiri, “Engagement Law (Supreme Court Decision Number 951 K/Pdt/2015),” QISTINA J. Multidisiplin Indones., vol. 2, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.57235/qistina.v2i2.832.
A. I. Laturette, “Breach of Contract Settlement of Quasi Equity Agreement Between Investor With Indigenous People Soa Nacikit Migodo at Buru Island,” Yuridika, vol. 38, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.20473/ydk.v38i1.37709.
R. M. Saleh, “Legal Consequences of Not Fulfilling the Terms of Validity the Agreement between Online Shop Owners and Endorser on Instagram Social Media,” Locus J. Acad. Lit. Rev., 2022, doi: 10.56128/ljoalr.v1i7.89.
Z. M. Rafif, “THE LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF A COOPERATION AGREEMENT DUE TO MERGER,” Law Rev., no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.19166/lr.v0i1.5360.
D. Fidhayanti, “In Contract Law: Unpacking Undue Influence through a Judge’s Lens,” J. Judic. Rev., vol. 25, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.37253/jjr.v25i2.7725.
European Commission, “Study on the status of new genomic techniques under Union law and in light of the Court of Justice ruling in Case C-528/16,” Comm. Staff Work. Doc., vol. SWD(2021), 2021.
B. Friedman, “LAWLESS SURVEILLANCE,” New York Univ. Law Rev., vol. 97, no. 4, 2022.
Rizal Nugra Wijaya and Rusdianto Sesung, “Legal Study on Withdrawal of Fiduciary Guarantee Based on the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 2/PUU-XIX/2021,” YURISDIKSI J. Wacana Huk. dan Sains, vol. 18, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v18i1.117.
Copyright (c) 2025 Ferry Irawan, Mulyadi Tanzili, Sri Suatmiati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the journal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
