A Contextual and Dialogical Approach to Human Rights: Reconceptualizing Universality
Abstract
Universal human rights that are enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) are globally celebrated as a basis for global justice. Yet its claims to universality have been constantly contested by criticisms that point to its embeddedness in particular historical, cultural, and ideological traditions. To identify the conceptual tensions between moral and legal universalism when adapting human rights norms, this article analyzes the dilemma of universalizing human rights norms across very different socio-political and cultural landscapes. It interrogates the implication of cultural relativism, gendered hierarchies, and the structures of power for political legitimacy and applicability of human rights discourse. This study argues for the reconceptualization of universality as a process that is dynamic as well as context-sensitive, yet maintains an ethical core while permitting multiple perspectives. It does so through an interdisciplinary analysis of a nuanced approach toward the reconciliation of foundational human rights principles with the practical realities of a world that is interconnected yet culturally diverse. This article adds to these debates about human rights by addressing those theoretical and practical challenges to the adaptability and normative coherence of human rights in contemporary global governance contexts.
References
Agamben, G. (2004). The Open: Man and Animal (K. Attell, Trans.). Stanford University Press. (Original work published 2002).
Alston, P., & Goodman, R. (2013). International human rights: The successor to international human rights in context: law, politics and morals. Oxford University Press.
Asad, T. (1993). The construction of religion as an anthropological category. In Genealogies of religion: Discipline and reasons of power in Christianity and Islam (pp. 27–54). Johns Hopkins University Press.
Benhabib, S. (2011). Another universalism: On the unity and diversity of human rights. In Dignity in adversity: Human rights in troubled times (pp. 57–76). Polity Press.
Butler, J. (2000). Restaging the universal: Hegemony and the limits of formalism. In Žižek, S., & Laclau, E. (Eds.), Contingency, hegemony, universality: Contemporary dialogues on the left (pp. 11–33). Verso.
Diagne, S. B., & Amselle, J. (2020). In search of africa(s) : Universalism and decolonial thought. Polity Press.
Donnelly, J. (2007). The relative universality of human rights. Human Rights Quarterly, 29(2), 281–306. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Esposito, R. (2012). Introduction. In Third Person (pp. 1-19). Polity Press.
Foucault, M. (1981). The order of discourse. In R. Young (Ed.), Untying the text: A post-structuralist reader (pp. 48–78). Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Freeman, M. (2011). Introduction: Thinking about human rights. In Human rights: An interdisciplinary approach (2nd ed., pp. 1-14). Polity Press.
Geertz, C. (2000). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. Basic Books. (Original work published 1973).
Habermas, J. (2005) Religion in the public sphere The Holberg Prize seminar 2005, Holberg Prize laureate Professor Jürgen Habermas: Bergen: University of Bergen.(pp. 10–19).
Hooks, B. (2014). Holding my sister’s hand: Feminist solidarity. In Teaching to transgress (pp. 93–110). Taylor and Francis.
Ishay, M. R. (2008). Human Rights and the Enlightenment. In The history of human rights: From ancient times to the globalization era (pp. 63-116) University of California Press.
Mahmood, S. (2009). Agency, Performativity and the Feminist Subject. In H. R. Christensen & L. Sjorup (Eds.), Pieties and Gender (1st ed., Vol. 9). (pp. 11–45). Brill.
Mann, G. (2022). The World Won’t Listen: The Mande “Hunters’ Oath” and Human Rights in Translation. Humanity: An International Journal of Human Rights, Humanitarianism, and Development 13(2), 129-145.
Mbembé, J.-A. (2003). Necropolitics (L. Meintjes, Trans.). Public Culture, 15(1), 11–40.
Nussbaum, M. C. (1999). Women and cultural universals. In Sex and social justice (pp. 29–54). Oxford University Press.
Rawls, J. (1997). The Idea of Public Reason Revisited. The University of Chicago Law Review, 64(3), 765–807.
Sachedina, A. A. (2009). The clash of universalisms: Religious and secular in human rights. In Islam and the challenge of human rights (pp. 3–39). Oxford University Press.
Said, E. W. (2003). Introduction. In Orientalism (pp. 1–28). Penguin Books. (Original work published 1978).
Schippers, B. (2018). Towards a posthumanist conception of human rights. In B. Schippers (Ed.), Critical Perspectives on Human Rights (pp. 63-84).Rowman & Littlefield.
Spivak, G. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–313). University of Illinois Press.
United Nations. (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights.
Witte, J., & Green, M. C. (Eds.). (2012). Introduction. In Religion and Human Rights: An Introduction (pp. 3–24). Oxford University Press.
Yuval-Davis, N. (2011). The Religious Question: The Sacred, the Cultural and the Political. In The Politics of Belonging (pp. 113–144). SAGE Publications.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the journal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
