Sentencing Disparities in the United States

Implications of a Second Trump Administration

  • Jennifer M. Miller School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of Arkansas at Monticello, Monticello, AR, United States
Keywords: Sentencing Disparities; Criminal Justice Reform; Trump Administration; Racial Inequities; Federal Sentencing

Abstract

The United States has historically faced sentencing disparities that stem from racial, socioeconomic, and geographic factors, creating unequal treatment within the criminal justice system. The article analyzes current sentencing disparity conditions with an emphasis on racial and ethnic disparities while assessing how another Trump presidency could influence these patterns. Based on literature reviews and government reports, the paper presents evidence that Trump administration policies and their associated rhetoric might worsen current disparities through stricter sentencing practices alongside reduced enforcement of federal sentencing guidelines and reversal of criminal justice reforms. The paper ends by suggesting strategies to address these disparities amid possible policy changes.

References

Alexander, M. (2020). The new Jim Crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. The New Press.

Berman, D. A. (2017). Sentencing reform in the Trump era. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 29(5), 291–295. https://doi.org/10.1525/fsr.2017.29.5.291.

Berman, D. A. (2019). The First Step Act and its implications for federal sentencing. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 31(4), 239-244. https://doi.org/10.1525/fsr.2019.31.4.239.

Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.

First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, 132 Stat. 5194 (2018).

Gramlich, J. (2020). America’s incarceration rate is at a two-decade low. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org.

Henrichson, C., & Delaney, R. (2012). The price of prisons: What incarceration costs taxpayers. Vera Institute of Justice.

Lappi-Seppälä, T. (2012). Penal policies in the Nordic countries 1960–2010. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 13(sup1), 85–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/14043858.2012.728015.

Rachlinski, J. J., Johnson, S. L., Wistrich, A. J., & Guthrie, C. (2009). Does unconscious racial bias affect trial judges? Notre Dame Law Review, 84(3), 1195–1246.

Spohn, C. (2000). Thirty years of sentencing reform: The quest for a racially neutral sentencing process. Criminal Justice, 3, 427–501.

Tonry, M. (1995). Malign neglect: Race, crime, and punishment in America. Oxford University Press.

Ulmer, J. T. (2012). Recent developments and new directions in sentencing research. Justice Quarterly, 29(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2011.624115.

U.S. Sentencing Commission. (2021). Demographic differences in sentencing: An update to the 2012 Booker report. https://www.ussc.gov.

Walmsley, R. (2018). World prison population list (12th ed.). Institute for Criminal Policy Research.

Western, B. (2006). Punishment and inequality in America. Russell Sage Foundation.

Published
2025-05-10
How to Cite
Miller, J. (2025). Sentencing Disparities in the United States. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 8(5), 35-48. https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v8i5.2635