An Investigation into the Effectiveness of Section 139 of the Constitution in Municipalities under Administration: A Case of KwaZulu-Natal Municipalities

  • Mpilo Ngubane Independent Researcher, Doctor of Administration from the University of KwaZulu-Natal and Doctor of Public Administration for the University of Zululand, South Africa/Adjunct Professor at UNISA, School of Business Leadership, South Africa
Keywords: Section 139; Intervention, Administration; Dysfunctionality, Collapse of Governance; Service Delivery; Obligations; Financial Crisis; Diagnostics; Constitution; Municipalities; Indicators; Targets; Performance

Abstract

The local government sector in South Africa is always marred with challenges in service delivery which is an indication that some municipalities are struggling to fulfil their constitutional mandates or obligations. The Constitution Act (1996) of the Republic of South Africa mandates provincial and national government departments to intervene in municipalities that are failing to meet their constitutional obligations such as service delivery, revenue collection, financial management, financial reporting, playing an oversight role, etc. Even though there are diagnostics reports detailing the reasons for dysfunctionality of municipalities that end up being under Section 139, the three main contributing factors to such kind of intervention are collapse of governance, failed service delivery and financial crisis. The rising number of municipalities under Section 139 intervention in South Africa in general is alarming. This has led to general perception that possibly Section 139 interventions are not effective. Both the Auditor-General of South Africa and the Chairperson of the Select Committee of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs joined the Parliamentary Committee in raising concerns about possible ineffectiveness of Section 139 interventions. These are some of the reasons why this study investigated effectiveness of Section 139 interventions in KwaZulu-Natal municipalities.

References

Chamberlain, L. & Masiangoako, T. (2021). ‘Third time lucky? Provincial intervention in the Makana Local Municipality’, South African Law Journal, 138(2), 432-459.
De Visser, J. and November, J. (2017). ‘Overseeing the Overseers: Assessing Compliance with Municipal Intervention Rules in South Africa’, Hague Journal of the Rule of Law, 9, 109-133.
Khaile, T. (2023). ‘The effectiveness of Section 139 interventions in strengthening the municipal accountability architecture in South Africa’, Journal of Local Government and Innovation, 4(0), 1-19.
Ledger, T. & Rampedi, M. (2019). Mind the gap: Section 139 interventions in theory and practice, Public Affairs Research Institute (PARI).
Makoti, M. Z. and Odeku, O. K. (2018). ‘Intervention into municipal affairs in South Africa and its impact on municipal basic services’, African Journal of Public Affairs, 10(4), 68-85.
Mettler, J. (2003). ‘Provincial-municipal relations: A few challenges. Published online.
Republic of South Africa (RSA), 1996, The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa (Constitution), No. 108 of 1996, Government Printers, Pretoria.
Republic of South Africa (RSA), 2003, The South African Local Government: Municipal Finance Management Act, No, 56 of 2003, Government Printers, Pretoria.
Published
2025-01-06
How to Cite
Ngubane, M. (2025). An Investigation into the Effectiveness of Section 139 of the Constitution in Municipalities under Administration: A Case of KwaZulu-Natal Municipalities. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 8(1), 241-251. https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v8i1.2600