Patriarchy Driven Invisible Exploitation Among Putting Out System Women Workers in Moslem Democracy Country
Abstract
Most workers in the Putting-out System (POS) are dominated by women who come from poor families, are married and have children, have low education and do not have skills who work because of family economic pressures. This homework is informal work that is vulnerable to exploitation by not getting decent wages, long working hours, and not getting social protection such as work accident insurance and insecure job status. The Indonesian Home Workers Network (Jaringan Pekerja Rumahan Indonesia/JPRI) is an organization that accommodates homeworkers to carry out social movements to obtain decent work. However, the involvement of female homeworkers in this movement is still very low. This study aims to describe how female workers are increasingly exploited because they are not considered worthy of their rights as workers and how the patriarchal system perpetuates this exploitation by placing women in the domestic sphere and examines JPRI efforts to raise this issue by utilizing social movements. This study is a descriptive study with a qualitative feminist approach. The selection of informants was carried out by snowballing method to members of JPRI and the Trade Union Rights Center (TURC) as an NGO accompanying JPRI. The results of the study show that female homeworkers’ choice of jobs reflects invisible exploitation based on gender discrimination and this is reinforced by the dominance of men over women through a patriarchal system that is perpetuated through the institutions of family, economic and nation. The study recommends that at the macro level, the government needs to recognize the existence of home workers by making regulations related to home workers so that their problems are exposed. Meanwhile, at the micro level, JPRI needs to continuously build awareness among female home workers that they are also real workers by taking individual and group approaches.
References
Agarwala, R (2014). Informal workers' struggles in eight countries. The Brown Journal of World Affairs, Vol. 20, No. 2 (Spring / Summer 2014), pp. 251-263 (13 pages). https://www.jstor.org/stable/24590985.
Badan Pusat Statistik. Proporsi lapangan kerja informal menurut jenis kelamin, 2021-2023.
Bhatt, Ela (1989). Toward empowement. World Development, Vol 17, No.7. Great Britain: Pergamon Press.
Bryman, A (2012). Social research methods (4th ed). USA: Oxford University Press, Inc.
Butler, J (1990). Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
Bonner, C (2022). Home-based workers organizing from local to global. dalam Nilson, M; Mazumdar, I; Neusinger, S (Ed). Home-based work and Home-based workers (1800-2021). https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1163/j.ctv29sfvdz.22.
Carr , M; Chen, M A; Tate, J (2000). Globalization and home-based workers. Feminist Economics. DOI: 10.1080/134557000750020164.
Carranza, E; Das, S; Kotikula, A (2023). Gender-based employment segregation: understanding causes and policy intervention. Jobs working paper Issue No.26. USA: World Bank Group Jobs.
Custer, P (2012). Capital accumulation and women's labour in Asian economies (2nd Ed). London: Zed Books.
Dadheech, R & Sharma, D (2022). Home-based work or non-home-based work? Factors influencing work choices of women in the informal sector. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, Vo.43 No.1/2. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-08-2021-0200.
Delaney, A; Burchielli, R ; Connor, Tim, (2017). Positioning homeworkers inglobal footwear production network: how can homeworkers improve agency, influence and claim rights. Journal of Industrial Relation, Vol 57 (4) 641-659. DOI: 10.1177/0022185615582237.
Delaney, A., Burchielli, R., Marshall, S., Tate, J. (2019). Homeworking women: a gender justice perspective. London: Routledge.
Fakih, Mansour (1996). Menggeser konsepsi gender dan transformasi sosial. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Floro, M.S. & Pichetpongsa, A. (2010). Gender, work intensity, and well-being of Thai home-based workers, Feminist Economics, 16(3), pp 5-44, 2019, 24 Agust. DOI: /abs/1080/13545701.2010.499657.
Ghina, A; Destiani, A; Carrisa V: Nabila V 28 Maret, 2022. Bagaimana kapitalisme dan patriarki bekerja dalam penindasan perempuan. Lembaga Kajian dan Pengambdian Masyarakat Demokratis. Bandung: Universitas Pajajaran.
Gimenez, M (2005). Capitalism and the oppression of women: Marx revisited. Journal of Science and Society Vol. 69, No.1, January 2005. https://doi.org/10.1521/siso.69.1.11.56797.
Gurstein, P (1998). Gender, class dan race in the invisible worksite: Disaggregating the homemaker population.Journal: Gender, Technology and Development, 2:2, 2019-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.1998.11909889.
Haezy, M A; Hapsari, Maharani (2020). Analalisis penindasan pekerja perempuan di industri ready-made garment Bangladesh. Skripsi Universitas Gajah Mada.
Hassan, S M & Azman, A (2014). Visible work, invisible workers: a study of women home based workers in Pakistan. Journal of Social Work and Human Services Practice. Vol. 2, April 2014. DOI: 10.13189/ijrh.2014.020207.
Handayani, D & Taufiq, A (2020). Action plans against women's invisibility home worker (putting out system). Journal of Humanities and Social Studies. Vol.4, No 2 (2020). DOI: 10.33751/jhss. v4i2.2578.
Hughes, Kendra (2016). Strengthening the movement of home-based workers. WIEGO: November 2016
Hunga, A (2013). The paradox of the growing importance of the "Putting-Out" Sistem in the Development of Batik Industry. The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Organization Studies. https://doi.org/10.18848/2324-7649/CGP/v07i02/53446.
Izzati, F F (2016). Women's work and capitalism: housewifization and home-based labor in Indonesia contex. Paper present on panel 17" Women's in Southeast Asia's Economy, Politic and Society of ASEASUK Conference in SOAS University of London, 16-18 September, 2016.
Jannah, Miftakhul (2017). Model advokasi LSM Mitra Wanita Pekerja Rumahan Indonesia: studi advokasi kebijakan dalam peningkatan kesejahteraan perempuan pekerja rumahan di kota Malang. Skripsi. Malang: Univrsitas Brawijaya.
Kabeer, N (1994). Reversed realities: gender hierarchies in development thought. London: Verso.
------ (2011). Contextualising the economic pathway of women's empowerment: finding from multi-country research programme. Pathway Policy Paper, Oktober, 2011.
Kholifah, Siti (2006). Eksploitasi pada wanita yang bekerja sebagai buruh pabrik (studi deskriptif pada buruh pabrik di kawasan industri kecamatan Sedati- kabupaten Sidoarjo). Project Report Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Universitas Brawijaya Malang.
Konvensi ILO No. 177 Tahun 1996 tentang Pekerja Rumahan.
Laslett, B & Brenner, J (1989). Gender and social reproduction: historical perspective. Annual review of sociology, Vol 15 (1989) pp 381-404. Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2083231.
Mies, Maria (1998). Patriarchy and accumulation on a world scale: women in the international division of labour. London: Zed Books Ltd.
Newman, W L (2014). Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches (7 th edition). England: Pearson Education Ltd.
Nilsson, M; Mazumdar, I & Neusinger, S (2022). Home-based work and home-based workers (1800-2021). Leiden Netherland: Koninklijke Brill, NV.
Pattenden, J (2022). The patriarchy of accumulation: homework, fieldwork and the production-reproduction nexus in rual Indonesia. Candian Journal of Development Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2022.2054784.
Prasetyo, D D (2017). Invovement of women as home-based workers in Indonesia: profile, contributing factors, and implications to their life condition. Paper Proceding of the Second Asia-Pacific Conference on Multidiciplinary Research. Sri lanka: International Center for Research and Development.
Saleh, D; Swastika, N; Fatikhah, R A (2023). Minimnya dukungan industri dan negara: Kerja perawatan pada perempuan pekerja pabrik dan rumahan. Jurnal Perempuan, Vol. 28 No. 3 Desember 2023. DOI: 10.34309/jp.v28i3.878.
Sangupta, S (2019). Paid-unpaid work continuum of women: Home-based workers and self-employed women in the national capital region. The Indian Journal of Labour Economics. DOI:100.1007/s41027-019-00176-7.
Sinha, Shalini (2013). Supporting home-based workers: the approach of the self-employed women's Association in India. WIEGO Policy Brief (Urban Policies) No.13, March.
Shiratarrant (2006). When sex become gender. Great Britain: Routledge.
Solechan (2018). Perlindungan homeworker yang bekerja secara putting-out system. Journal Administrative Law & Governance. Vol 1 Edisi 4 November 2018. https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v1i4.386-390.
Sue, R (1997). But are they expoited? industrial home workers in the 1990 New Jersey cencus. The International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy: Vo1. 17, No. 3/4: 63-110. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb013301.
Sultana, Abeda (2011). Patriarchy and women's subordination: a theoritical analysis. The Art Faculty Journal.
Walby, Sylvia (1990). Theorizing patriarchy. Great Britain: T.J. Press Ltd.
Wahid, D Z; Arfandi, H; Syahdenal, L M; Setiawan, M; Ratnawati, S & Ariesti, Y S (2017). Geliat pekerja rumahan dalam pusaran industri padat karya: Studi kasus tiga daerah. Jakarta: Trade Union Right Centre.
WIEGO (2021). Statistical Brief No.27, Januari 2021. Great Britain: T.J. Press, Ltd.
Yentriyani, A; Saleh, D; Ulya, N H (2022). Kondisi hak azazi manusia perempuan pekerja rumahan: Pemetaan awal pada 6 propinsi di Indonesia. Jakarta: Komnas Perempuan.
Tamyis, A, R & Warda, N (2019). Laporan Studi Midline MAMPU: Tema 2 Akses perempuan miskin pekerja rumahan terhadap perlindungan sosial tenaga kerja. Jakarta: The SMERU Research. Mei 2019.
Copyright (c) 2024 Fitriah Fitriah, Johanna Debora Imelda, Indra Lestari Fawzi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the journal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).