‘Umusaani Burwa’: How Families in the Bugisu Sub-Region Conceptualise Masculinity in Response to Safe Male Circumcision in Uganda

  • Bernard Omukunyi The Centre for Interdisciplinary Studies of Children, Family and Society (CISCFS), Faculty of Community Health Science, The University of the Western Cape, South Africa
  • Nicolette V. Roman The Centre for Interdisciplinary Studies of Children, Family and Society (CISCFS), Faculty of Community Health Science, The University of the Western Cape, South Africa
Keywords: Bugisu sub-region; Conceptualise; Families; Masculinity; Response; Safe Medical Male Circumcision; Umusaan Burwa

Abstract

Abstract

 

This qualitative study used unstructured interviews to gain insights into how families in the Bugisu sub-region conceptualise masculinity in response to safe medical male circumcision (SMMC), as promoted by the Ugandan government. Results were obtained from cultural leaders, clan leaders, traditional surgeons, medical officers, 2016 initiates, focus groups and the key informant, a representative of Inzu ya Masaaba. Processing the audio recorded responses and data analysis involved transcribing, interpreting, coding, categorising, and generating findings using Atlas Ti software. The results of the study suggest that families in the Bugisu sub-region are ambivalent about the implementation of the safe medical male circumcision policy (SMMCP). Both historical and political attempts to abolish TMC have evoked resistance, with most holding firmly to TMC as the only means by which Bamasaaba boys can acquire the status of manhood. However, some families see health values in medicalised male circumcision practices and believe that medicalisation has caused positive adaptations to TMC for purposes of enhanced hygiene and safety.

 

Published
2022-03-26
How to Cite
Omukunyi, B., & V. Roman, N. (2022). ‘Umusaani Burwa’: How Families in the Bugisu Sub-Region Conceptualise Masculinity in Response to Safe Male Circumcision in Uganda. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 5(3), 290-306. https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v5i3.214