Three-Dimensional Functional Brand Protection in Indonesia After the Implementation of Law Number 6 of 2023 (Comparison of Regulations in the United States and Japan)
Abstract
Since the entry into force of the Law No. 20 of 2016 on Trademarks and Geographical Indications, Indonesia has officially granted recognition to 3 (three) dimensional trademarks. Nevertheless, this Act only provides provisions concerning the formality requirements for filing applications for registration of 3 (three) dimensional trademarks. Substantially, the Act No. 6 of 2023 on the Establishment of Government Regulations replaced the Law No. 2 of 2022 on the Creation of Works into the Act adding a provision in article 20 of the Act no. 20 of 2016 that forms of a functional nature cannot be registered as trademarks. There is no explanation of the meaning of functional form in this Act. Based on this problem, the author tries to study the implications of the current Copyright Act using grammatical interpretation methods as well as using a comparative approach to the provisions in the United States and Japan. This article explains about the three-dimensional distinctive force, associated with the secondary meaning theory. Based on research in literature, it is known that there is a breakdown between trademarks and patents in the registration of forms of a functional nature. This article also reinforces the argument that a functional form cannot be protected as a trademark.
References
Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual, 2020, Modul Kekayaan Intelektual Bidang Paten, Jakarta
Dwi Agustine Kurniasih, Apalah Arti Sebuah Nama? (What’s in a Name?), Rechtsvinding Online https://www.rechtsvinding.bphn.go.id/jurnal_online/Apalah%20Arti%20Sebuah%20Nama1_Dwi.pdf
Hukum Online, https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/yuk--kenali-pelindungan-objek-tiga-dimensi-antara-merek--desain-industri-dan-paten-lt63d8a0f33e584/?page=2
Indriyanto, Agung dan Irnie Mela Yusnita, 2017, Aspek Hukum Pendaftaran Merek, Jakarta : Rajawali Pers,
Jened, Rahmi, 2017, Hukum Merek (Trademark Law)cdalam Era Global dan Integrasi Ekonomi, Jakarta : Kencana.
Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia Online, https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id
Lundstedt, Lydia, 2016, Territoriality in Intellectual Property Law, Stockholm: Stockholm University.
Mayana, Ranti Fauza dan Tisni Santika, 2021, Hukum Merek “Perkembangan Aktual Perlindungan Merek dalam Konteks Ekonomi Kreatif di Era Disupsi Digital”, Bandung: Refika Adirama.
Mertokusumo, Sudikno, 2021 Penemuan Hukum Suatu Pengantar, Yogyakarta: Maha Karya Pustaka.
Noerhadi, Cita Citrawinda, 2020, Perlindungan Merek Terkenal dan Konsep DIlusi Merek dari Perspektif Global, Jakarta: Pustaka Obor Indonesia
Permata, Rika Ratna dkk, 2021 Pelanggaran Merek di Indonesia, Bandung: Rafika Aditama
Purwaningsih, Endang, 2019, Hukum Paten, Bandung: Mandar Maju
__________________, 2020, Paten dan Merek, Malang: Setara Press
Santoso, Aris Prio Agus dkk, 2020, Hukum atas Kekayaan Intelektual, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Baru Press.
Utama, Yuliana, 2021, “Pelindungan Merek Berbasis Tingkat Daya Pembeda Ditinjau dari Doktrin Dilusi Merek di Indonesia”, Acta Diurnal Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum UNPAD, Vol. 5 No.1
Wardianto, K. Bagus, 2019, “Implementasi Konsep Ekuitas Merek di Indonesia: Sebuah Perspektif Keuangan”, Jurnal Business UHO, Vol.4 No. 2
Wijayanti, Ana Wahyu, 2021, “Merek Tiga Dimensi dalam Hukum Merek Indonesia”, Bina Mulia Hukum Vol 6, No.1
Yuswanto, Slamret, 2017, Hukum Paten, Bandung : Keni Media.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the journal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
