An Analysis of Saps Partnership with Other Government Departments in Identifying First-Time Offenders Through Fingerprints

  • Ntombenhle Cecilia Dube University of South Africa, South Africa
  • Angel Mabudusha University of South Africa, South Africa
Keywords: Fingerprints; Latent Prints; Undetected Case; First-Time Offender

Abstract

The South African Police Service`s (SAPS) fingerprints system can only identify persons who had previously been charged of an offence, meaning it cannot identify latent prints of innocent people or first-time offender with no prior criminal charges. As a result, over 100 000 first-time offenders were unidentified even though there were positive latent prints collected from the crime scene. This is because the South African Police data capturing system does not have information of first-time offenders while other departments such as Home Affairs and Transport including Traffic department is in possession of such fingerprints. The only challenge is to access that particular information lawfully. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to explore the use of fingerprint systems to identify latent-prints of first-time offenders. This is to ensure that other government departments which collect fingerprints from their clients, are partnering with the South African Police Service in an effort to identify first-time offenders. The research approach used in this article is a qualitative approach with a purposive sampling of extracting rich data from identified experts who are working with the fingerprint system. The researchers interviewed 19 participants in this article due to the capacity of fingerprint experts. The findings of this article confirms that the SAPS Local Criminal Record Centre (LCRC) cannot identify latent prints of first-time offenders and that many case dockets are still closed with positive fingerprints because of the lack of identification information. The implemented Person Identification Verification Application (PIVA) system which integrates the fingerprint systems from a few government departments cannot identify latent prints. The article recommended the implementation of a system that will allow LCRC to identify first-time offenders who are not on the Automated Fingerprint Investigation System (AFIS). It also recommended that the SAPS should have a database of fingerprint information from the citizens who are applying for security checks. This database can store information separately from that of the criminal records. To avoid poorly obtained fingerprints as it has been a concern of all participants, police stations should be issued with digital fingerprints scanners.

References

Babbie, E. & Mouton, J. 2012. The Practice of Social Research. 14th edition. United Kingdom. Oxford University Press.
Creswell, J. W. 2013. Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. 3rd edition. Thousand oaks. Sage Publications.
De Vos, A. S., Strydom, H., Fouchè, C.B. & Delport, C.S.L. 2011. 4th edition. Research at Grass Roots. For the social sciences and human service professions. Pretoria. Van Schaik Publishers.
Electronic Privacy Information (EPIC). 2019. EPIC Urges FBI to Limit Fingerprint-Based Background Checks: 09 January 2018). Retrieved from https://archive.epic.org/2017/08/fbi-issues-final-rule-on-biome.html. (Accessed on February 2019).
Evert, L. 2011. Unidentified bodies in Forensic Pathology Practice in South Africa. Unpublished MSc in Health Sciences Dissertation. University of Pretoria. Pretoria.
Giordano, A.D. 2011. Data Integration Blueprint and Modelling. Techniques for a Scalable and Sustainable Architecture. USA. Pearson.
IJS. (Integrated Justice System). 2017. Progress Report. Integrated Justice System (IJS) Programme. Select Committee on Security and Justice. 31 May 2017. Department of Justice and Constitutional Development. Retrieved from pmg-assets.s3-website-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com › 170531IJSReport. (Accessed on 18 November 2019).
IJS. (Integrated Justice System). (2020). Integrating the Criminal Justice Information Systems. November 2020. (Accessed on 27 December 2020).
Henry, S. & Lanier, M.M. 2001. What is a Crime. Controversies over the Nature of Crime and What to Do about It. Florida. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Komarinski, P., 2005. Automated Fingerprint Identification System (AFIS). Retrieved from https://books.google.co.za/books?id=kSfYd2Pj9V4C&pg= PA13&dq=paperless+fingerprinting. (Accessed on 21 June 2022).
Leseba, G. 2015. Integrated Justice System (IJS). Presentation Portfolio Committee on Police. Theme: the deterrence of Crime in South Africa through CJS modernization: 10 June 2015. Retrieved from https://pmg.org.za › files › 150610IJS. (Accessed on 18 November 2019).
Makwethu, K. 2020. Auditor General South Africa. Media Release. Auditor-General says the multi-billion-rand Covid-19 relief package landed in an environment with many control weaknesses. Retrieved from https://www.agsa.co.za. (Accessed on 20 October 2020).
Newburn, T. Williamson, T. & Wright, A. 2007. Handbook of Criminal Investigation. New York. Willian Publishing.
News24 Archives. 2010. Police get access to fingerprint. 2 June. Available at http://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/Politics/Police-get-access-to-fingerprints-20100602 (Accessed on: 25 October 2017).
Olckers. C. 2007. An examination of the impact of residential security measures on the incidence of residential burglary in two selected northern suburbs of Johannesburg. Unpublished Magister Technologiae. University of South Africa. Pretoria.
Shaler, R.C. 2012. Crime Scene Forensics. A Scientific Method Approach. Florida. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group.
South Africa. 1996. Constitution of South Africa. Act 108 of 1996. Pretoria. Government Printers.
South Africa. 2010. Criminal Law (Forensic Procedures) Amendment Act No 6 of 2010. Pretoria. Government Printers.
South Africa. 2013. Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013. Cape Town. Government Printers.
South Africa. 2014. Department of Correctional Services. March 2014. The use of Integrated Systems. White Paper on Remand Detention Management in South Africa. Pretoria. Government Printers.
South African Police Service (SAPS). 2012. National Instruction/Standing Order 325. Closing of Case Dockets. Division: Detective Services. V0.02. Issued by Consolidation Notice 2012.
South African Police Service. 2021. Annual Report. 2020/2021. Vote 28. Retrieved from https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/202201/saps-annual-report-202021.pdf. (Accessed on 22 February 2022).
South African Police Service. 2022. Annual Report. 2021/2022. Vote 28. Retrieved from https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/202211/saps-2021-22.pdf. (Accessed on 10 February 2023).
Thomas, S. 2009. Department of Justice and Constitutional Development. Integrated Justice System. Criminal Law Forensic Procedure Amendment Bill. Retrieved from pmg-assets.s3-website-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com › docs. (Accessed on 13 November 2019).
Van Rooyen, H.J.N., 2008. The Practitioner`s Guide to Forensic Investigation South Africa. Pretoria. Henmar Publications.
White Paper on Remand Detention Management in South Africa. See South Africa. 2014.
Wyllie, D. 2017. How biometric technologies will help correctional facilities, May 16, 2017. Retrieved fromhttps://www.correctionsone.com/products/police-technology/investigation/biometrics-identification/articles/how-biometric-technologies-will-help-correctional-facilities-HAjTzVlupizKxEVV/. (Accessed on 12 February 2020).
Published
2024-01-12
How to Cite
Dube, N. C., & Mabudusha, A. (2024). An Analysis of Saps Partnership with Other Government Departments in Identifying First-Time Offenders Through Fingerprints. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 7(1), 518-529. https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v7i1.1977