The Legitimacy of a Medical Certificate (Health Certification) in the Criminal Justice System (Corruption Eradication)

  • Lawrensia Binar Mutiara Satyadriti Master of Law, Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University, Indonesia
  • Joko Setiyono Master of Law, Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University, Indonesia
Keywords: Doctors; Criminal Justice

Abstract

A doctor's notes is a letter from the doctor regarding the general condition of a person, whether healthy or sick. The case of H.M. Suharto, Eddy Tansil, Setya Novanto, and Bambang W. Soeharto proved that differences in perception were often misused. In the event of misuse of the doctor's notes, aside from being administratively and professionally accountable, it is possible to be criminally liable. The problem in this journal is to what extent is the strength of proof of a doctor's notes in the criminal justice system and how to find out whether the doctor's notes are genuine or fake in criminal liability. The research method used in this journal is normative juridical. Complexity colours the process and creation of a doctor's notes. The integrity of law enforcers, ranging from the National Police, Attorney General's Office, Corruption Eradication Commission, Judges, Correctional Institution, even Lawyers, are sometimes inconsistent in carrying out their profession. Potential problems will arise if law enforcers do not ask for a second opinion or establishing an independent team of doctors. As suggestions, the making of doctor's notes must be based on professional ethics, doctor's oath, and independence in accordance with the laws. The role of the Majelis Kehormatan Etika Kedokteran needs to be strengthened to maintain the professionalism of doctors. Criminal penalties for doctor and other parties who participate in the making of a doctor's note that meets criminal elements must be strictly enforced.

References

Adji, Indriyanto Seno. Humanisme Dan Pembaruan Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kompas, 2009.
Alatas, Syed Husein. Sosiologi Korupsi Sebuah Penjelajahan Dengan Data Kontemporer. Jakarta: LP3ES, 2002.
Hamzah, Andi. Delik-Delik Tertentu (Speciale Delicten) Di Dalam KUHP. Jakarta: Penerbit Pusat Studi Hukum Pidana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti, 2010.
Hamzah, Andi. Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Penerbit Sinar Grafika, 2017.
Hiariej, Eddy O.S. Teori Dan Hukum Pembuktian.Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga, 2002.
Hukum, Tim Penelitian. Aspek Hukum Surat Keterangan Dokter Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Jakarta, 2002.
Nitibaskara, Tb. Ronny Rahman. Perangkat Penyimpangan Dan Kejahatan Teori Baru Dalam Kriminologi. Jakarta: Penerbit YPKIK, 2009.
Notoatmodjo, soekidjo, Etika dan Hukum Kesehatan; jakarta; Rineka cipta. 2010.
Prarmono, Widyo, Pemberantasan Korupsi dan Pidana lainnya. Sebuah Perspektif Jaksa dan Guru Besar, Jakarta. Buku Kompas, 2016.
Prasetyo, Teguh. Kriminalisasi Dalam Hukum Pidana, Bandung. Nusa media. 2010.
Purbacaraka, Soerjono Soekanto & Purnadi. Sendi-Sendi Ilmu Hukum Dan Tata Hukum. Bandung: Penerbit Citra Aditya Bakti, 1993.
Sidharta. Moralitas Profesi Hukum Suatu Tawaran Kerangka Berfikir. Bandung: Penerbit Refika Aditama, 2006.
Soekanto, Soerjono. Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: Penerbit CV Rajawali Press, 2002.
Suharyo. “Penegakan Keamanan Maritim Dalam NKRI Dan Problematikanya.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Volume 19, no. Nomor 3 (2019): Hal. 288.
Sunaryo, Sidik. Kapita Selekta Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Malang: Penerbit UMM Press, 2004.
Suryadhimirta, Rinanto, Hukum Malpraktek Kedokteran Disertasi Kasus dan Penyelesaiannya. Yogyakarta. Total Media. 2010.
Published
2024-01-12
How to Cite
Binar Mutiara Satyadriti, L., & Setiyono, J. (2024). The Legitimacy of a Medical Certificate (Health Certification) in the Criminal Justice System (Corruption Eradication). International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 7(1), 363-370. https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v7i1.1921