Adaptability and Copability of Faith-Based Organization in facing the Changing of External and Internal Environment (Case study: Pondok Sosial “Rumah Kerang” – North Jakarta)

  • Engelina Diah Wulandari Magister Student, Department of Social Welfare, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Ety Rahayu Lecturer in the Department of Social Welfare, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia
Keywords: Faith-based Organization; Adaptability; Copability; Internal Dan External Environment

Abstract

One of the ways to attain the welfare condition is through human service organization (HSO), which specifically can be run by faith-based organization (FBO). In this research, FBO takes part in providing social services, some are directly related to certain beliefs, and involve spiritual aspects as the soul, a source of empathy, and charity as good deeds. FBO can be organized by Religious Catholic Congregations which have social services. This study discusses about the ability of FBO belongs to a Congregation, that is Pondok Sosial “Rumah Kerang” located in Cilincing, North Jakarta. It can continue to be sustainable in the changing environment without losing its identity. The contingency theory is the basic for this research, which the organization is an open system and has ability to adapt itself. In an increasingly secular world whose influence to FBO, an open system needs the ability to adapt to changing challenges from outside and inside, for it responds the need of beneficiaries (personal, community, and society levels). The ability to face changes from outside is called adaptability (Motamedi in Bennis & Benne, 1985), consists of types: conforming, controlling, resisting, and opposing. The internal ability to deal with situations from inside of the organization is called copability, consists of types: resolution, arresting, stalling, and stressing. In this way, FBO can maintain its integrity and identity. The role of FBO run by a Religious Congregation is strengthened by religious tradition, commitment to social services, and the inheritance of social provisions passed down to the Congregation. They become a substitute for resisting (adaptability) and stalling (copability), so FBO can be survived. Even though, FBO must optimize client transformation, especially by being open to technology of social work.

References

Books
Adi, Rukminto Isbandi. (2013). Kesejahteraan Sosial: Pekerjaan Sosial, Pembangunan Sosial, dan Kajian Pembangunan. Edisi ke-2, Rajawali Pers.
Amir, M. Taufiq. (2019). Perubahan Organisasi Positif: Peran Individu dan Kepemimpinan Positif. Jakarta: Universitas Bakrie.
Bennis, Warren G., et. al. (1984). The Planning of Change, 4th edition, CBS College Publishing.
Bryman, Allan. (2012). Social Research Methods, 4th edition, Oxford University Press.
Canda, Edward R. & Furman L.D. (2010). Spiritual Diversity in Social Work Practice: The Heart of Helping. New York: Oxford University.
Furman, Rich, Margaret Gibelman, et.al. (2021). Navigating Human Service Organizations, Essential Information for Thriving and Surviving in Agencies, 4th ed., Oxford University Press.
Hasenfeld, Y. (Ed.). (2010). Human Services as Complex Organizations. Sage Publications, Inc.
Jones, Andrew & John May. (1999). Working in Human Service Organizations. Australia: Longman
Kettner Peter M. (2013). Excellence in Human Service Organizations 2nd, Pearson Education. Inc.
Lawrence, Paul R. & Lorsch, Jay W., (1967). Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration, Boston: Harvard University.
Lewis, Judith A., et. al. (2001). Management of Human Service Programs. 3rd ed. USA: Brooks/Cole Thomson Learning
Margaret, Alston & Wendy Bowles, (2003). Research for Social Workers: An Introduction to Methods, 2nd ed. London: Routledge
Neuman, W. Lawrence, (2014), Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approach, Pearson New International Edition
Patti, Rino J., (2009). Handbook of Human Services Management 2nd ed. Sage Publication. Inc.
Payne, Malcolm & Emma Reith-Hall, (2019). The Routledge Handbook of Social Work Theory, New York: Routledge.
Proehl, Rebecca Ann. (2001), Organizational Change in Human Services. Sage Publications. Inc.
Rubin, Allen & Earl R. Babbie. (2014). Research Methods for Social Work. USA, Cengage Learning: Boston.
Journal, Thesis, and Dissertation
Brooks, Jacqueline Denise, (2008). Congregations and Social Services: An Analysis of Inter-Organizational Networks, Dissertation, The Ohio University.
Hutting, Jessica, Ety Rahayu, (2022). Adaptasi Organisasi Pelayanan Manusia selama Pandemi Covid-19 (Studi pada Yayasan Kampus Diakoneia Modern). Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling: Vol. 4 Nomor 6 Tahun 2022. https://journal.universitaspahlawan.ac.id/index.php/jpdk/article/view/9005
Kelman, Herbert C. (1958). Compliance, Identification, and Internalization, Three Process of Attitude Change. Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol.2 Issue 1 Sage Journals, March 1958
Krefting, L. (1991). Rigor in Qualitative Research: The Assessment of Trustworthiness. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45(3).
Schmid, Hillel, (2004). Organization-Environment Relationship, Journal Administration in Social Work. Routledge: Taylor & Francis.
Sider, Ronald J. & Heidi Rolland Unruh, (2004). Typology of Religious Characteristics of Social Service and Educational Organizational and Programs. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Vol. 33, no. 1, March 2004 109-134, Sage Publication.
Published
2023-12-06
How to Cite
Diah Wulandari, E., & Rahayu, E. (2023). Adaptability and Copability of Faith-Based Organization in facing the Changing of External and Internal Environment (Case study: Pondok Sosial “Rumah Kerang” – North Jakarta). International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 6(12), 182-193. https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v6i12.1824