A Comparative Analysis of Homelessness: A Case of New York City and the City of Chicago

  • Mpilo Ngubane Independent Researcher, Doctor of Administration from the University of KwaZulu-Natal and Doctor of Public Administration from the University of Zululand, South Africa
Keywords: Homelessness; Homeless People; Shelters; Housing First Concept; Health and Social Services; Skills Development; Partnerships

Abstract

The concept of homelessness is evolving with time and so are its definitions. Sentimental definitions of homelessness have also led to definitional inconsistencies and these limitations have the ability to obscure how countries and cities respond to homelessness. With rapid urbanization and regular country-driven conflicts which exacerbate migration, it is without a doubt going to be difficult for cities to eradicate homelessness in the near future. Many cities of the world are not only struggling to have a common understanding of a homeless person, but also have difficulties in developing and implementing strategies to deal with homelessness. It is for this reason that this study focused on the comparative analysis of how New York City and the City of Chicago, which have been hailed as the most successful cities in reducing homelessness, have dealt with this phenomenon. The study used qualitative and comparative analysis to determine the cross-cutting themes between the two cities. The study has evidently emphasized and demonstrated, among other things, the significance of the legislation to provide exclusively for homeless people and also the formulation of Strategies by cities to deal with homelessness. Recommendations were made based on what cities could learn from both New York City and the City of Chicago respectively.

Author Biography

Mpilo Ngubane, Independent Researcher, Doctor of Administration from the University of KwaZulu-Natal and Doctor of Public Administration from the University of Zululand, South Africa

Adjunct Professor at UNISA, School of Business Leadership, South Africa

References

Benjaminsen, L. & Dyb, E. (2008). The Effectiveness of Homeless Policies-Variations among Scandinavian Countries, European Journal of Homelessness, 2, 45-67.
Birks, M., Chapman, Y. & Francis, K. (2008). Memoing in qualitative research: probing data and processes, J Res Nurs, 13(1), 68-75.
Burt, M. R., Aron, L. Y., Lee, E. & Valente, J. (2001). Helping America’s Homeless Emergency Shelter or Affordable Housing, Washington DC: Urban Institute Press.
Busch-Geertsema, V. (2010). Defining and Measuring Homelessness, in E, O’Sullivan, V. Busch-Geertsema, D. Quilgars and N. Peace (Eds.). Homelessness Research in Europe, Festschrift for Bill Edgar Joe Doherty, Brussels: FEANTSA.
Chamberlain, C. & Mackenzie, D. (1992). Understanding Contemporary Homelessness: Issues of Definition and Meaning, The Australian Journal of Social Issues, 27(4), 274-297.
Edgar, B. (2009). European Review of Statistics on Homelessness, Brussels: FEANTSA.
Edgar, B., Harrison, M., Watson, P. & Busch-Geertsema, V. (2007). Measurement of Homelessness at European Union Level, Brussels: European Commission.
FEANTSA (2008). 2011 Round of Population Census, FEANTSA Recommendations for the enumeration of homeless people in census night, Brussels: European Commission.
Frazer, H. & Marlier, E. (2009). Homelessness and Housing Exclusion across EU Members States. Analysis and Suggestions in the Way Forward by the EU Network of Independent Experts and Social Inclusion, Brussels: European Commission.
Gale, N. K., Heath, G., Cameron, E. Rashid, S and Redwood, S. (2013). Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research, BMC Med Res Methodol, 13. 117.
Homeless Task Force Report (2018). Tools and Resources for Cities and Counties, California: Institute for Local Government.
Kate, A., Baker, M. & Howden-Chapman, P. (2020). The ETHOS Definition and Classification of Homelessness, Wellington: University of Otago.
Lee, B. A., Tyler, K. A. & Wright, J. (2010). The new Homelessness Revisited, Annual Review Sociology, 36, 501-521.
Minery, J. & Greenhalgh, E. (2007). Approaches to Homelessness Policy in Europe, the United States and Australia, Journal of Social Issues, 63(3), 641-655.
OECD (2016). Education at a Glance 2016: OECD Indicators, Paris: OECD Publishing.
Snow, D. A. & Anderson, L. (1993). Down on their Luck: A Study of Homeless Street People, Kirkley: University of California Press.
Widdowfield, R. (1999). The Limitations of Official Homelessness Statistics, in D. Dorling & S. Simpson (Eds.). Statistics in Society: The Arithmetic of Politics, London: Arnold.
Published
2023-10-06
How to Cite
Ngubane, M. (2023). A Comparative Analysis of Homelessness: A Case of New York City and the City of Chicago. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 6(8), 352-364. https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v6i8.1754