Implementation of Restorative Justice as an Alternative Case Settlement Strategy Involving Pornography on Social Media (Case Study of Reported Case at Bogor City Police Station)
Abstract
The occurrence of a crime that uses information technology raises new problems in enforcing criminal law both regarding acts that are prohibited and punishable-by crime as well as those relating to the system-of evidence and evidence that can be used to prove that a crime has occurred and in determining who the perpetrators of the crime are. The problem of implementing Restorative Justice at Polresta Bogor City aims to create public order and society, which in this case requires the involvement of the state which in this case is the court. The concept of Restorative Justice has been accommodated in various agencies, but no single regulation specifically addresses this theme. The regulations for Restorative Justice need to be clarified so as not to cause social inequality, where everyone must be seen as equal before the law. The handling of Restorative Justice must be ensured that it does not violate applicable law, with reference to the Integrated Criminal Justice System. This study has the intent and purpose of knowing how to implement Restorative Justice as an alternative settlement of cases involving pornography reported at the Bogor City Police. The type and type of research used by researchers is descriptive qualitative research with a case study approach. The results of the study show that the implementation of Restorative Justice as an alternative strategy for solving pornographic cases reported-at the-Bogor City-Police has-been carried-out as-fully as-possible by-the Bogor-City Police by resolving criminal cases involving perpetrators, victims,-families of perpetrators/victims,-and other parties who-related to-jointly seeking-a fair-solution by-emphasizing restoration-to its-original state.-Settlement is done by reaching an agreement between the two parties.
References
Angkupi, P. (2017). Kejahatan Melalui Media Sosial Elektronik Di Indonesia Berdasarkan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Saat Ini. MIKROTIK: Jurnal Manajemen Informatika, 2(1).
Arief, B. N. (2000). Perlindungan HAM dan Korban dalam Pembaharuan Hukum. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.
Badrih, M. A. (2021). Restorative Justice Dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Pencemaran Nama Baik Di Media Sosial. Seminar Nasional Sistem Informasi (SENASIF), 5, 2860–2870.
Bryson, J. M. (2011). Perencanaan Strategis Bagi Organisasi Sosial. Pustaka Pelajar.
Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1996). Competing for the Future. Harvard Business Press.
Kennedy, J. L. D., Tuliao, A. P., Flower, K. N., Tibbs, J. J., & McChargue, D. E. (2019). Long-term effectiveness of a brief restorative justice intervention. International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology, 63(1), 3–17.
Liebmann, M. (2007). Restorative justice: How it works. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Muslih, S., Ramadhani, M., Riyanti, D. A., & Marizal, M. (2021). Implementasi Restorative Justice Pada Penyelesaian Kasus Pencemaran Nama Baik Dalam UU ITE. Widya Pranata Hukum: Jurnal Kajian dan Penelitian Hukum, 3(2), 98–114.
Nugroho, A. F. (2023). Legal Protection For Victims Of Fair Trial Rights As A Form Of Human Rights Protection In The Indonesian Justice System. Policy, Law, Notary and Regulatory Issues (POLRI), 2(1), 1–12.
Quinn. (2019). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework, Reading. Mass: Addison Wesley.
Rahardjo, S. (2018). Ilmu Hukum. PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Ramadhan, A. R. (2015). Pencemaran Nama Baik dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Jurnal IUS, 3, 601–619.
Rangkuti, F., & Analisis, S. (2018). Teknik membedah kasus bisnis cara perhitungan bobot, rating, dan OCAI. Jakarta: PT gramedia.
Safitri, M. N. (2022). Pendekatan Restorative Justice Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencemaran Nama Baik Melalui Media Sosial sebagai Implementasi Asas Ultimum Remedium. Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jawa Timur.
Silaen, A. (2020). Penegakan Hukum Pelaku Delik Pencemaran Nama Baik (Studi Putusan Nomor: 4/Pid. C/2020/PN. TLK). Jurnal Hukum PATIK, 9(3), 215–226.
Simamora, F. P., Simarmata, L. D., & Lubis, M. A. (2020). Kajian Hukum Pidana terhadap Perbuatan Pencemaran Nama Baik melalui Media Sosial. Jurnal Retentum, 1(1), 34–43.
Soebagijo, A. (2008). Pornografi: Dilarang tapi dicari. Gema insani.
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D (hal. 336).
Warsita, B. (2008). Teknologi pembelajaran landasan dan aplikasinya.
Wisnubroto, A., & Widiartana, G. (2015). Pembaharuan Hukum Acara Pidana. Citra Aditya Bakti.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the journal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
