Children Data Privacy: A Comparative Analysis on the United States of America, European Union and Indonesian Law
Abstract
In this era where data are easily found and collected by others through the internet, it becomes a threat for children who are still unable to protect his/her self correctly, especially on data privacy. The main objective of this paper is to address the importance of parental involvement in protecting children data privacy through the comparative approach between Indonesia, the United States of America and the European Union. This paper concludes the parental involvement is significant to protect children data privacy. These objectives are achieved through literature review and analysis of legal instruments.
References
Betti, D. (2020). TIK TOK under review by European Privacy authorities. MEF (Mobile Ecosystem Forum). https://mobileecosystemforum.com/2020/01/29/tik-tok-under-review-by-european-privacy-authorities/.
Dewi, S. (2016). Konsep Perlindungan Hukum Atas Privasi Dan Data Pribadi Dikaitkan Dengan Penggunaan Cloud Computing Di Indonesia. Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, 5(1), 35–53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v5i1.8712.
Finnegan, S. (2019). How Facebook Beat the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act: A Look into the Continued Ineffectiveness of COPPA and How to Hold Social Media Sites Accountable in the Future. Seton Hall L. Rev., 50, 827. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/shlr50&div=28&id=&page=.
Hoofnagle, C. J., Van Der Sloot, B., & Borgesius, F. Z. (2019). The European Union general data protection regulation: what it is and what it means. Information & Communications Technology Law, 28(1), 65–98. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2019.1573501.
Lukács, A. (2016). What is privacy? The history and definition of privacy. http://publicatio.bibl.u-szeged.hu/10794/7/3188699.pdf.
Pelteret, M., & Ophoff, J. (2016). A review of information privacy and its importance to consumers and organizations. Informing Science, 19, 277–301. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.28945/3573.
Piranda, D. R., Sinaga, D. Z., & Putri, E. E. (2022). Online Marketing Strategy In Facebook Marketplace As A Digital Marketing Tool. Journal of Humanities, Social Sciences and Business (JHSSB), 1(3), 1–8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55047/jhssb.v1i2.123.
Tavani, H. T. (2007). Philosophical theories of privacy: Implications for an adequate online privacy policy. Metaphilosophy, 38(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2006.00474.x.
Tavani, H. T., & Moor, J. H. (2001). Privacy protection, control of information, and privacy-enhancing technologies. ACM Sigcas Computers and Society, 31(1), 6–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/572277.572278.
Timberg, C., & Romm, T. (2019). The U.S. government fined the app now known as TikTok $5.7 million for illegally collecting children’s data. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/02/27/us-government-fined-app-now-known-tiktok-million-illegally-collecting-childrens-data/.
UNICEF. (2020). East Asia and the Pacific Regional Office, Our Lives Online Use of social media by children and adolescents in East Asia – opportunities, risks and harms. Unicef.Org. https://www.unicef.org/indonesia/media/3106/file/Our-Lives-Online.pdf.
United Nations. (2022). OHCHR and privacy in the digital age. In OHCHR. https://www.ohchr.org/en/privacy-in-the-digital-age.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the journal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).