Legal Protection for Debtors with Non-Performance Debtors Due to Cessie Practices in Banking Agreements

Juliman Juliman; Kadek Wiwik Indrayanti; Diah Aju Wisnuwardhani

doi:10.47814/ijssrr.v8i3.2609

Juliman Juliman University of Merdeka, Indonesia
Kadek Wiwik Indrayanti University of Merdeka, Indonesia
Diah Aju Wisnuwardhani University of Merdeka, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v8i3.2609

Keywords: Bad credit; Cessie/ Debt Transfer; Creditor; Debtor

Abstract

The debtor defaulted while the creditor desired that the receivables owned be received immediately, aka no longer having to collect from the debtor, who is most likely unable to pay off the credit. This Cessie action is considered legal and can be carried out in Indonesia. However, no single rule regulates its implementation so that it is not carried out arbitrarily. Because the implementation of Cessie in practice is sometimes very detrimental to the debtor, especially debtors whose remaining debt is not much or has little remaining, it is necessary to know the legal regulations related to the transfer of receivables (cession) in resolving bad debts in Indonesia, and what form of legal protection for debtors who are harmed by the implementation of cession according to positive law. This study uses a normative research method with an analytical descriptive analysis method. The regulation of cession is generally regulated in the civil code, precisely in book three concerning obligations and in several special laws such as the Mortgage Law and the Fiduciary Law, and Bank Indonesia regulations in general, cession is permitted as long as the parties agree on it by making a new agreement. Meanwhile, the legal protection for the harmed debtor is a cession agreement that the debtor is not informed of. It can be categorized as an invalid agreement because the object still belongs to the debtor, so it can be canceled or null and void by law.

References

Ambarwati, Azkia Dwi. “Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Hak Atas Tanah Yang Terikat Jaminan Bank (Studi Kasus Putusan NOMOR 704K/PDT/2016)”. Indonesian Notary 1, no. 001 (February 28, 2019). http://notary.ui.ac.id/index.php/home/article/download/31/30.
Anisah, Siti. “Perlindungan Terhadap Kepentingan Kreditor Melalui Actio Pauliana”. JURNAL HUKUM IUS QUIA IUSTUM 16, no. 2 (January 1, 2009) : 205–21. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol16.iss2.art3.
Christy, Evie, Wilsen Wilsen, and Dewi Rumaisa. “Kepastian Hukum Hak Preferensi Pemegang Hak Tanggungan dalam Kasus Kepailitan”. Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 22, no. 2 (August 16, 2020): 323–44. https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v22i2.14909.
Fitriana, None Diana, and None Abdul Wahid. “Upaya Hukum Cessionaris Terhadap Hak Tagih Atas Jaminan Hak Tanggungan Berdasarkan Pengalihan Hutang (Cessie)”. Jurnal Hukum Sasana 7, no. 2 (December 9, 2021): 243–62. https://doi.org/10.31599/sasana.v7i2.808.
Fuady, Munir. 2006. Segi-segi Hukum Perjanjian, Cetakan IV, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Marwansyah, Sofyan. “Analisis Penerapan Prinsip ‘5C’ Terhadap Akurasi Analisa Kredit Pada PT. First Indo American Leasing”. Moneter - Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan 1, no. 2 (January 1, 2014). https://doi.org/10.31294/moneter.v1i2.949.
Maryoso, Isnaini and Muhammad Citra Ramadhan. “Pelaksanaan lelang eksekusi hak tanggungan melalui media internet masa pandemi Covid-19 berdasarkan Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (Studi pada KPKNL Medan)”. Journal of Education Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS) 4, no. 2 (October 24, 2021): 616–28. https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v4i2.694.
Maslikan dan Sukarmi. “Kewenangan Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta Otentik Berkaitan Dengan Kontrak Kerjasama”. Jurnal Akta 5, no. 1 (March 5, 2018): 11. https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v5i1.2526.
Monada, Thorico, Achmad Jaka Santos Adiwijaya, and Ujang Bahar. “Eksekusi Putusan Hakim Terhadap Objek Hak Tanggungan Yang Telah Dilakukan Cessie”. JURNAL ILMIAH LIVING LAW 13, no. 2 (July 31, 2021): 84–90. https://ojs.unida.ac.id/livinglaw/article/download/4401/2580.
Nasution, Adawiyah. “Pelunasan Hutang Terhadap Jaminan Fidusia”. Jurnal Hukum Kaidah Media Komunikasi Dan Informasi Hukum Dan Masyarakat 17, No. 3 (July 31, 2018): 112–20. Https://doi.Org/10.30743/Jhk.V17i3.594.
Rahmadinata, Yogi. “Pengalihan Piutang Secara Cessie Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Kredit dan Akibat Hukumnya Terhadap Jaminan Hutang Debitur”. Recital Review 4, no. 1 (February 16, 2022): 25–61. https://doi.org/10.22437/rr.v4i1.15273.
Rahman, Aulia. “Pelaksanaan Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kreditur Atas Hilangnya Objek Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Di KBPR Eka Usaha JEMBER”. Kumpulan Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum, January 9, 2016. http://hukum.studentjournal.ub.ac.id/index.php/hukum/article/view/1935.
Rahman, Sufirman, and Eddie Rinaldy. 2013. Hukum Surat Berharga Pasar Uang. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Sakkirang, Sriwaty. 2011. Hukum Perdata. Yogyakarta: Teras.
Setiawan, I ketut Oka. 2019. Hukum Pendaftaran Tanah dan Hak Tanggungan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Subekti. 1998. Hukum Perjanjian. Jakarta: Intermasa.
Vollmar, HFA. 1990. Hukum Benda Menurut KUHPerdata. Cet.2. Bandung: Tarsito.
Widjaja, Gunawan, and E. Paramitha Sapardan. 2006. Seri Aspek Hukum Dalam Pasar Modal, Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Widjaja, Adi. “Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Jaminan Hak Tanggungan Dalam Penyelesaian Kredit Macet Di Lembaga Perbankan”. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan 3, no. 1 (June 26, 2018): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.17977/um019v3i12018p001.
Yangin, Feronika Y. “Analisis Hukum Pengalihan Piutang (Cessie) Kepada Pihak Ketiga Menurut PASAL 613 KUH PERDATA”. Lex Administratum: Jurnal Elektronik Bagian Hukum Administrasi Negara Fakultas Hukum Unsrat 4, no. 5 (July 12, 2016): 156219. https://www.neliti.com/publications/156219/analisis-hukum-pengalihan-piutang-cessie-kepada-pihak-ketiga-menurut-pasal-613-k.
Yusmita, Yusmita, Riski Pebru Ariyanti, Enricho Duo Putra Njoto, and Rizal Yudistira. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Debitur Dan Kreditur Dalam Melakukan Perjanjian Baku”. DiH Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 15, no. 1 (February 1, 2019): 59–67. https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v15i1.2265.