The Conditions for Successful Adoption of Equipment

A Case Study Within the French Army

Keywords: Appropriation; Diversion of Use; Weapon; Efficiency; Practice; Faith

Abstract

Equipment only reveals its full effectiveness if it is properly mastered. In a military context, performance is a key objective, which is why it is important to understand the conditions for successful mastery. Through interviews with combatants focusing on a specific piece of equipment, the author highlights three elements: intensive practice leading to the incorporation of the object, believing in one’s equipment, and loving it. These conditions also facilitate alternative uses, thereby expanding the range of possibilities for using the artifact. Conversely, shortened training, excessive standardization and an equipment that leaves little room for the user’s creativity can restrict mastery. Finally, the culture in which the user is immersed can encourage or hinder diversion of uses, depending on the degree of conformity or passivity required of the combatants.

Author Biography

Sophie Lefeez, University of Caen, France

I have been researching and teaching for more than ten years. I have specialised in military equipment policy, innovation, hich-tech quest. My other research areas include : economic, political and social history of the 18th and 19th centuries ; the foundations of modern science and how it affects our R&D today (mechanization, automation, AI, bioengineering...).

I hold a Bachelor degree (licence) in economics, a Master degree in defence & political science from the University of Paris Panthéon-Assas, France, a MPhil in Conflit Transformation from the University of Port Elizabeth in South Africa, and a PhD in Sociology of technology from the University of Paris Panthéon-Sorbonne, France.

By combining disciplinary approaches and adopting a long-term perspective, I have developed an original method of analysis focusing on the interrelationships between society, the economy, science and technology.

References

"27th Battalion of Alpine Hunters", Fench Amy, n. d. https://www.defense.gouv.fr/terre/unites-larmee-terre/nos-brigades/27e-brigade-dinfanterie-montagne-27e-bim/27e-bataillon-chasseurs-alpins.

Audoin-Rouzeau, S. (2008). Combattre. Seuil.

Bailey, R. (2025). The Sword and the Cane: Martial Arts Weapons and the Boundaries of Cognition. Martial Art Studies, 18, 40-51. https://doi.org/10.18573/mas.257

Belk, R. (1988). Possession and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139-168. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2489522

Bret, P. (2002). L'Etat, l'armée, la science : l'invention de la recherche publique en France (1763-1830). Presses universitaires de rennes.

Brunel, O. & Roux, D. (2006). L'appropriation des produits par le consommateur : proposition d'une grille d'analyse. In A. Grimand (Ed.), L'appropriation des outils de gestion. Vers de nouvelles perspectives théoriques ? (pp. 83-104). Publications de l'Université de Saint-Etienne.

Craipeau, S. & Metzger, J.-L. (2011). La gestionnarisation de la société : de la volonté de maîtrise à la déréalisation. Mana : revue de sociologie et d’anthropologie, 17-18, 23-40.

DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1994). Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory. Organization Science, 5(2), 121–147. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2635011

DeSanctis G. & Poole M. (1990). Understanding the use of group decision support systems: The theory of adaptive structuration. In J. Fulk & C. Steinfield (Eds), Organizations and communication technology, Sage Academic Books, 173-191. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483325385.n8

Focillon, H. (2015). Éloge de la main. Marguerite Waknine (Original book published in 1934).

Gros, F. (2006). États de violence. Essai sur la fin de la guerre. Gallimard.

Hatto, R., Muxel, A. & Tomesc, O. (2011). Enquête sur les jeunes et les armées : images, intérêts et attentes. Études de l'IRSEM, 10.

Henry, M. (1987). La barbarie. Grasset.

Ives, B. & Olson, M. (1984). User Involvement and MIS Success: A Review of Research. Management Science, 30(5), 586-603. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.5.586

Jouët, J. (1993). Usages et pratique des nouveaux outils de communication. In L. Sfez (Ed.), Dictionnaire critique de la communication (p. 371). PUF.

Kapp, E. (2007). Principes d'une philosophie de la technique, Vrin (Original book published in 1877).

Lefeez, S. (2020). La gestionnarisation des forces armées. Gérer et comprendre, 140(2), 19-29. https://doi.org/10.3917/geco1.140.0019

Leroi-Gourhan, A. (2005). Milieu et technique. Albin Michel (Original book published in 1945).

Orlikowski, W. 1996. Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time. Information Systems Reseach, 7(1), 63-92. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.7.1.63

Porteret, V. (2003). À la recherche du nouveau visage des armées et des militaires français: les études sociologiques du Centre d'études en sciences sociales de la défense. Revue française de sociologie, 44(4), 799-822. https://doi.org/10.2307/3323238

Rice, R. & Rogers, E. (1980). Reinvention in the Innovation Process. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 1, 499-514. https://doi.org/10.1177/107554708000100

Published
2026-09-03
How to Cite
Lefeez, S. (2026). The Conditions for Successful Adoption of Equipment. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 9(9), 12-23. https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v9i9.3478