Analysis of Erdo?an's Discourse of Slang and Threats: Psychological and Sociological Dimensions of Language

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the psychological and social impacts of slang and threatening rhetoric used in Erdo?an's political discourse. The primary issue of the study is to understand how Erdo?an's use of harsh language shapes the psychological effects on society and his political strategies. In this context, the threatening and slang expressions in Erdo?an's speeches were examined to evaluate their effects on social polarization, leadership perception, and supporter motivation. The research was conducted as a case study within the scope of qualitative research. Data obtained through document analysis were analyzed using thematic and discourse analysis methods. During the analysis process, the frequency, context, and impacts of the slang and threatening rhetoric were examined in detail, providing an in-depth evaluation of the social and psychological reflections of these expressions. According to the findings, Erdo?an's slang and threatening statements play a significant role in deepening social polarization and reinforcing his supporters' loyalty to the government. This use of language minimizes governmental accountability by attributing criticisms to external forces and functions as a strategy to strengthen national unity. By highlighting the effects of this rhetoric on political strategy and leadership image, the study explains the influence of harsh language on psychological and social dynamics.